you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rdh2121 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Good. The more vaccinated, the better.

Also, that source is a ridiculously biased, scientifically-inaccurate, fearmongering cesspool. This sub deserves trustworthy sources, not editorials generating fear-clicks. Be better.

[–]fred_red_beans[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Ad-hominem response, you are attacking the authority of the article and not the substance.

Why are you an this site if you are not willing to listen to differing viewpoints?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Good response Fred. I'm with Fred here. What are you doing here? Please discuss the topic.

"Scientifically inaccurate"... Because you say so? I guess it's the "known neurotoxins" part, which seem to be the only "scientific" statement on that page, which has you stating this? Formaldehyde is a neurotoxin. Mercury is a neurotoxin, so is aluminum.

What are we talking about here?

[–]foreskin_burglar 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

While I agree with your criticism of this anti-vax article, I do not agree with the way in which you’ve disagreed. For every belief/opinion you hold, no matter how obvious the credibility of this belief seems to you and others, there are people who hold an opposite belief with equal conviction that it’s correct. Imagine if an anti-vaxxer replied to you this way, without any concrete explanation or source for why you’re wrong.

If you want to change someone’s mind, you need to have patience, understanding, and present sources. Baseless aggressive criticism and shaming are what’s wrong with social media today. Please help fight divisiveness.