you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lenin viewed ethnic or cultural loyalties with contempt. He had little regard for his own countrymen.

An intelligent Russian," he once remarked.

is almost always a Jew or someone with Jewish blood in his veins."

It should be noted, that many of these warmongering criminals running around calling themselves Semites are no such thing. They're largely Ashkenazis, who originated from the Caucasus mountains, and lived in the vicinity of the Khazaks (aka Cossacks) of Russian and Khazakstan. In addition, they follow the extremely heretical culture of the Talmud, which excuses many forms of reprehensible behavior that serves supremacist ideologies.

In contrast, the true descendants of Israel, who refer to themselves as Hebrews and Kaolians, do NOT study, endorse, or otherwise subscribe to the writings found in the Talmud, are truly honorable and Godly people.

"Jews" = Ashkenazi =/= descendants from ancient Israelites

Kaolians = Hebrews == descendants from ancient Israelites

Ashkenazi Jews therefor, are not Jews except in name only.

An argument might be made that Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry comes from the Israelites such as in Chapter 10 of the book “The Jews of Khazaria”, Second Edition, published by Rowman and Littlefield in 2006.

However, we can certainly challenge the logic.

the main ethnic element of … most modern Jewish populations of the world is Israelite,” but supports this with “the Israelite haplotypes fall into Y-DNA haplogroups J and E.”

However, earlier the book stated that “the Y-DNA haplogroups J and E … are typical of the Middle East” but not limited to Israel.

So the logic seems to be:

All jews are (haplogroups J and E) All (haplogroups J and E) are middle eastern; the latter including “Kurdish, Armenian, Palestinian Arab, Lebanese, Syrian, and Anatolian Turkish peoples” From this we could conclude the family heritage with middle eastern peoples, not Israel simply. And if Turks are lumped in with that group, as the book does, there is no contradiction in the assertion that they are not the true Israelites. Indeed, coming full circle in that way shows the absurdity of the “rebuttal.”

The “middle east” is taken to include Armenians, Arabs, and Turks, and this itself shows the difficulty of these studies using samples after the mixing has occurred. Unless they can get enough DNA from the ancients, there is a great deal of assumption that must be mixed in. This is similar to the claim a while ago that some Negroes were descended from Thomas Jefferson. You can go up the chain, with 1/2 admixing at every step, then you have to go back down the chain, with 1/2 mixing at every step. And the DNA at each of the “1/2 admixing” steps, if it were available at all, is also the result of such a series of 1/2 admixtures.

Later, the author identifies Khazars as Europeans, which is absurd.

[–]JustAnotherRevanFan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So doesn't that disprove the Khazar hypothesis, as Jews don't have a significant Central Asian(which is what the Khazars are widely accepted as) linked Y-DNA?

[–]Jesus[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It does to an extent but other studies disprove this study. So, there's much confusion. But it seems that they came from Armenia and Turkey regions. Armenia is fairly close to the Pale of Settlement.

[–]JustAnotherRevanFan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you link the study that shows this?