Ocasio Cortez CRUSHED The Democratic Establishment Proving The Leftist Mob OWNS The Party Now

submitted by Tarrock from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

These are the faults:

1) It's Soros, not "Soro". Nice dogwhistling, though.

2) It is a reasonable inference, based on polling done by neutral people who know more about public opinion than you or I, that 60% of white Americans support BLM. Maybe if you did a push poll (sorry, push pole) and told everyone that an evil Jew donated to them a few years back then you'd convince them otherwise. Until that happens, however, the fact remains that most Americans support Black Lives Matter.

3) Your recent post is the first time anyone's mentioned anyone being "anarchist", so I'm clearly not "respon[ding] to statements that they are an anarchist group."

4) I know of no BLM organization (and it is more than one organization) that is anarchist. EDIT: Now that I think about it, it's such a broad movement that I wouldn't doubt there's some anarchists involved somewhere. But you haven't shown that the movement in general is "anarchist".

5) Not really a fault, but the sentence beginning with "Where as the link poll" should be rewritten, because I have no idea which poll you're referring to and it's just generally confusing.

6) AOC's main obstacle was a primary challenge, since this is a strongly blue seat.

7) I care about your feeling because I care about you, bro.

By the way, have you actually found any flaws any of the polls I listed? Because if your argument is that Americans aren't progressive, you need to show that they don't hold the opinions these polls say they do.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

"1) It's Soros, not "Soro". Nice dogwhistling, though."

I have no idea what that means, and I don't care.

" Because if your argument is that Americans aren't progressive"

I don't think you understand, I don't have an argument. I'm just trying to figure out what it is you are saying. That question wasn't an argument you needed to debate, or argue against. It was simply a play by play narrative, of your dialog.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It's pretty obvious to anyone with mediocre reading skills that I'm saying Americans are progressive on the major issues, and thus OP shouldn't be surprised by this outcome.

I have no idea what that means, and I don't care.

How sad to be so incurious.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

"How sad to be so incurious."

Right, please enlighten me as to what soro is a dog whistle for. Look, I searched, but I didn't find anything. Am I sending this dog whistle to you? Because it's just me and you in this thread, so is that what I am being accused of doing?

"It's pretty obvious to anyone with mediocre reading skills that I'm saying Americans are progressive on the major issues, and thus OP shouldn't be surprised by this outcome."

OP wasn't surprised by this outcome. Nobody was, she's the incumbent.

this statement from the-unflattering-6:

"No they don't. While its true that it's very difficult to get people off of entitlement programs, that's wholly different from the stunts leftists pull every day - several times a day - right now. These people are unhinged and poll after poll confirms that they are totally at odds with what Americans want. They don't want to defund the police, topple statues, burn down churches - in other words, total anarchy. "

received a reply of this one:

"Also, most Americans support Black Lives Matter. 60% of white people support BLM. And again, I'm talking about important shit, not old statues to traitors."

Plus a huge block of spam. somehow equates to this statement:

"...Americans are progressive on the major issues, and thus OP shouldn't be surprised by this outcome."

Are you sure it's reading skills I need? And not say, mind reading skills?

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Right, please enlighten me as to what soro is a dog whistle for.

It's Soros. And I thought you didn't care to find out?

Plus a huge block of spam

How is evidence "spam"?

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

"How is evidence "spam"?"

When it's a disconnect cold intro, that's unrelated to what it's being replied too, then followed up with, the statement of "also" as though it's an extension of a statement. Which it wasn't. That wasn't 'evidence' they were unrelated poll results, that you pasted as a reply, to an accusation of BLM being a group of anarchists.

"It's Soros. And I thought you didn't care to find out?"

Your right, it is Soros. So which is the dog whistle, Soro, or Soros? Again, feel free to enlightenment me on which one of those words is a dog whistle, and to whom it was aimed. And more importantly, how it was a dog whistle in the first place.

As for that "100 Million Victims of Communism" thread that you are engaged in, I'm not sure if the word 'pedantic' is best used in a self referential manner, in that instance. As for the rest of it.... Are you sure you and everyone in that thread aren't just rogue A.I? Because, every statement is so disconnect from each other it's maddening.

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You keep claiming your feelings aren't hurt, yet you're following me across the website.

Totally something someone who's definitely not mad will do.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

"Totally something someone who's definitely not mad will do."

You actually think that only people who hate you take an interest in you? You do realize that looking at your submissions is a way to get to know you? To understand you better?
that's down vote thinking. And there is no down vote here at saidit.

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/030/403/YouMad.jpg

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

https://giphy.com/gifs/rickandmorty-adult-swim-rick-and-morty-l41lI4bYmcsPJX9Go

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"It's Soros. And I thought you didn't care to find out?"

You are right. I didn't care to find out. But your antagonizing bating statement prompted a response. And you know that.

"How sad to be so incurious."

Now close the thesaurus tab before someone becomes unconcerned for the merits of tangible existence, and I deem it necessary to exit out of my reality!

[–]kissfan7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, "incurious" is just the word "curious" with the prefix "in". It's not that hard.