James Corbett: Now that the major institutions pushing the COVID panic are now admitting that the virus is not an existential threat and the lockdowns were not necessary, what does this mean for the future of the COVID-1984 police state and the ushering in of the new “biosecurity” paradigm?

submitted by Orangutan from corbettreport.com

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

haha someone reported this post with:

Post is supporting Conspiracy theories

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's hilarious.

I should start doing that.

I'll tell on myself.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Covid is only deadly if your at a gun rally or a Trump rally.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

they're not admitting that and it probably is coming back with a second wave

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Coming back for another 0.23% of the population?

The 2017 influenza was much more deadly.