you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

That's the way! Don't address any of the arguments. Attack the speaker! That's the lowest level of the Pyramid of Debate!

Berkeley is currently engaged in a furious effort to identify and purge the wrongthinker. We should know his identity in a few days when they fire him.

[–]thefadd 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

For the record, I actually think this is a fair and contributory comment. It's just done with a complex use of sarcasm which shouldn't be an issue.

To be completely unsarcastic, I think a lot of people here have a certain way of thinking and aren't open to ChipIt's intelligent, but inhibited manner of self-expression.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I am confused by this comment. Do you mean to say ChipIt was justified in lashing out?

[–]thefadd 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No -- I don't think /u/ChipIt lashed out at all.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Please read my other replies.

ChipIt and I are on the same side here. I cannot imagine why you would hold that opinion if you actually understood that.