As Pandemic Rages, NATO Shows Itself To Be As Irrelevant As Ever

submitted by RickC-137 from (zerohedge.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

you mean anti chinese propaganda? have a nice slow stroll through s/communismwatch :-)

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The problem is the people here in the US, and Zionists who are far from patriots. China is just the next middle east.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

China is just the next middle east.

that doesn't make any sense.

remember how ww2 was won because america had superior production capacities and technology? and how thanks to that it maintained its superpower position until nowadays?

well, now it is china in that very same position, or will be soon. if there would be a ww3 in the near future, china would have a good chance of outperforming american production of military hardware and thus winning the war. with the help of russia and the rest of the soviet union countries along the new silk road and using resources from africa of course, not just by itself.

so if the nwo wants to be successful they better keep china in tip-top shape. china is fronting the nwo, just look at the marxist/satanist united nations - it's all about china. look at africa, the african union (they are trying to copy the european union) is completely owned by china. african infrastructure is mostly chinese. and africa means resources. so they have the technology, the capacity, the manpower and the resources to take over the role of america on the world scene. they are pretty much set up for success.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I don't buy part of that American superiority stuff. WWI and WWII were planned in the 1800s by the son of Queen Vic, one of the very few royals that actually had abilities. He didn't get to live to see it all.

China has mo people mo problems. And they're not far behind the US in wealth inequality. I agree they might be capable of outperforming the US in a war, but mutually assured destruction is hardly a win. The US has more than enough to destroy the world several times over. Very profitable, but otherwise a pointless waste and no advantage. Yes it's also true that China is conquering Africa through smarts rather than guns, the way the US does. This also proves my point that NATO is antiquated. Like Africa will remain in poverty but supply the raw resources, so to with Russia.

China is set up for sure. I don't know what he means by "the next middle east" either.