I don't buy part of that American superiority stuff. WWI and WWII were planned in the 1800s by the son of Queen Vic, one of the very few royals that actually had abilities. He didn't get to live to see it all.

China has mo people mo problems. And they're not far behind the US in wealth inequality. I agree they might be capable of outperforming the US in a war, but mutually assured destruction is hardly a win. The US has more than enough to destroy the world several times over. Very profitable, but otherwise a pointless waste and no advantage. Yes it's also true that China is conquering Africa through smarts rather than guns, the way the US does. This also proves my point that NATO is antiquated. Like Africa will remain in poverty but supply the raw resources, so to with Russia.

China is set up for sure. I don't know what he means by "the next middle east" either.