all 21 comments

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Literally everyone in the world has proven to be inexplicably unprepared for this. The CDC alone has a 12 billion dollar a year budget and has provided literally zero assistance, leadership, or benefit in all of this. They have shown themselves to be a 12 billion dollar a year scam. And not one single news agency is holding their feet to the fire, or asking any kind of relevant questions. Instead they want to push the blame on to Trump.

We can't shut down the country for 2 weeks to kill off the virus. We could have everyone wear a hazmat suit for that amount of time. The cost of providing everyone with a hazmat suit would be a fraction of the CDC's budget. That doesn't even begin to factor in the cost of the retarded things we are doing in response to this.

The CDC squandered more money on casket liners that sit in empty fields that they rent than if they spent that money on positive pressure suits for everyone. They didn't even stock pile gloves and masks. They have zero ability to quarantine anything. They don't have mobile hospitals. They don't have any kind of plan to mobilize healthcare workers.

12 Billion Dollars a year. Every fucking Year. 12 Billion fucking Dollars. They need to get audited.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Brilliant !

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

this is coming from the https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/03/31/in-the-pandemic-nato-shows-itself-to-be-as-irrelevant-as-ever/

which is a russian propaganda outlet. and we know they want nothing more than to see nato disbanded!

[–]RickC-137[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Wouldn't want to stray outside of your Chinese propaganda would you....

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

you mean anti chinese propaganda? have a nice slow stroll through s/communismwatch :-)

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

The problem is the people here in the US, and Zionists who are far from patriots. China is just the next middle east.

[–]useless_aether 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

China is just the next middle east.

that doesn't make any sense.

remember how ww2 was won because america had superior production capacities and technology? and how thanks to that it maintained its superpower position until nowadays?

well, now it is china in that very same position, or will be soon. if there would be a ww3 in the near future, china would have a good chance of outperforming american production of military hardware and thus winning the war. with the help of russia and the rest of the soviet union countries along the new silk road and using resources from africa of course, not just by itself.

so if the nwo wants to be successful they better keep china in tip-top shape. china is fronting the nwo, just look at the marxist/satanist united nations - it's all about china. look at africa, the african union (they are trying to copy the european union) is completely owned by china. african infrastructure is mostly chinese. and africa means resources. so they have the technology, the capacity, the manpower and the resources to take over the role of america on the world scene. they are pretty much set up for success.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I don't buy part of that American superiority stuff. WWI and WWII were planned in the 1800s by the son of Queen Vic, one of the very few royals that actually had abilities. He didn't get to live to see it all.

China has mo people mo problems. And they're not far behind the US in wealth inequality. I agree they might be capable of outperforming the US in a war, but mutually assured destruction is hardly a win. The US has more than enough to destroy the world several times over. Very profitable, but otherwise a pointless waste and no advantage. Yes it's also true that China is conquering Africa through smarts rather than guns, the way the US does. This also proves my point that NATO is antiquated. Like Africa will remain in poverty but supply the raw resources, so to with Russia.

China is set up for sure. I don't know what he means by "the next middle east" either.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

remember how ww2 was won because america had superior production capacities and technology.

They won, more particularly, Zionists won, as did international bankers partly because they were funding the Soviet Union. But yes, their production capacities and tech. in some fields was far superior to axis powers. Their economic warfare and terror bombing was also powerful.

well, now it is china in that very same position, or will be soon. if there would be a ww3...

China is already a superpower, and has been exploited by internationalists since the 90's. It's just another manufacturing hub for multi-international corporations. People like David Rockefeller, want to make CHina the front of the NWO because the Chinese as a very nationalistic and cohesive society will glady accept their role. US citizens will not. The best options for the US, would be to maintain some sort of stability concerning European energy, whilst at the same time rely more on alternative means of energy and increase rural living and agritculutre in the US, by forgiving farm debts and subsidzing farmers. It seems like Neocons and Neoliberals hate farmers and rural folks and could care less about the stability of America within America. They'd rather just use propaganda daily to divide the people.

china would have a good chance of outperforming american production of military hardware and thus winning the war. with the help of russia and the rest of the soviet union countries along the new silk road and using resources from africa of course, not just by itself.

Israel has been caught selling classified US military data to CHina and Russia. Eventually, Israel will side with the BRIC alliance, it is geographically understandable. That isn't good for the US, so we should be focused on soverignty and being as self-sustaining as possible. Eventually, the US dollar will get dumped.

china is fronting the nwo, just look at the marxist/satanist united nations.

I agree with you, but the US is just as much a part of this scheme. There are NO real patriots in our government anymore. Most of them, in the CNP and CFR are following Rockefeller's "Prospect for America" script, which would allow China to reign supreme, but would give the US much leverage in the NWO. In the end, the REAL GOAL, is a one world government.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Zerohedge is a multilateral front. I'm no Neocon to attack Russia, Neocons are Zionist, Likudnik criminals, curiously there has been a break between the unilateral Neocons and Multilateral Neocons like Joffee. That being said there is clearly an effort to impose multilateralism as the new economic order.

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

i still think zh is a mixed bag w/o an agenda, but i never looked into it too hard. so i just try to filter out obvious stuff such as this.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure the owners are multilateralists. I remember posting about Zerohedge and their connections to Russia awhile ago. That isn't to say unilateral alternative media isn't propaganda.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Russiagate milked it a bit but NATO has been long irrelevant. Probably really always was.

Welcome to the New Mulit-Polar World Order. Globalism is out, now that it's been unified against "terrorism". Now we need opposing forces to drive the narrative.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

So?

[–]useless_aether 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

putin is an ex kgb chief, mass murderer and despot. one of the best servants of the nwo.

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

We need less weapons of mass destruction, including NATO.

Russia was not the threat they were made out to be during the Cold War, and aren't a threat now.

Russia, aside from their oligarchs, is a poor nation where raw resources come from to be processed by wealthier nations.

Russia, like the rest of the world, is run by Zionists - the real threat to stability.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, Putin is quite fond of Netanyahu and Trump.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Trump:

"I love the UN."

"I'm an internationalist and Nationalist."

[–]useless_aether 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

jesuit educated!

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Should there be any doubt that he is talking about world government, note Zionist Neocon Joffe’s concluding words:

"The best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually give it up."

Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leader- ship and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here. That means teh CFR and CNP. The point is to destroy the current order for a new one, allowing multilateralism to reign supreme. This will increase false nationalism in the US, while at the same time it will allow internationalism to take a hold with crypto-Zionist support.

Read Nathum Goldman's remarks on how they should impose this new order.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The G20 and G7's goal is to impose multilateralism which will trump Unilateralism. That means China, Russia, the BRIC Alliance, and Israel will reign supreme in the future.

/u/useless_aether

Alexander H. Joffe, a pro-Israel academic, has been a featured writer in the pages of this JINSA publication, and that he was given so much space to tout his theories certainly reflects the high regard in which his views are held.

According to Michael Collins Piper. quoted from his book until further notice:

In his essay, Joffee frankly admitted that “America is an empire” and asserts that, yes, this is a very good thing. Joffe says that when the UN dared to take on Zionism, that marked the demise of the UN in the minds of the internationalists.

Joffe writes:

“The end of the General Assembly as a credible body may plausibly be ascribed to the infamous ‘Zionism is Racism’ resolution in 1975.” The JINSA author contends that the world should be “grateful” that the UN has been “discredited, reduced to farce and ultimately ground to a halt,” referring, of course, to UN positions that the Zionists and their allies in the world empire movement find offensive.

As a result of the UN being shelved as a world government vehicle, writes Joffe, “We now have the opportunity, and obligation, to begin again.” However, he warns that the emerging European Union (EU) is a threat to the dream of a global empire.

The JINSA writer asserts that the EU is an:

“alternative vision for the international community,” one that, as he puts it, frankly is “the authentic countervision to an American Empire.”

According to the Zionist writer, the biggest problem with Europe and the EU is that:

“culture remains at the core of Europe’s problems. Nationalism was a doctrine born in Europe, as were its vicious mutant offspring: fascism and communism.”

(Note: A fervent advocate of Israeli super-nationalism, the writer, Joffe, doesn’t seem to see the lack of logic in his attack on other peoples’ nationalism—but then, again, honesty has never been integral to the hard- line Zionist point of view.)

Joffe complains that although “the new European Empire is multi- cultural in theory . . . in reality it is dominated politically and culturally by France and economically by Germany.”

Today, in the EU, he says:

“driven by a sense of postcolonial guilt and postwar ennui the door have been thrown open to all ideas. At the most sinister levels it has permitted and even legitimized a vast explosion of unhinged thought and action, namely anti-Americanism, anti-Semitism, and a wide variety of conspir- acy theories.”

(The so-called “conspiracy theories” that so alarm this Zionist theo- retician are those that dare to challenge the “official” views of what real- ly happened on September 11, 2001. He is inflamed that millions of peo- ple in Europe and the Muslim world—not to mention the United States—have raised questions about Israeli foreknowledge and/or involvement in those events.)

In any case, what Joffe describes as:

“the other kind of liberal internationalism”

...is what the Zionist movement favors and Joffe defines it:

The American Empire has no real or theoretical competitors. The goal of the American Empire in the 21st century is not territorial control or the exploitation of resources but political and economic leadership which defends and advances American interests, and which promotes the development and well being of all nations. Given our history and our values, that future lies in leveraging the American Empire in such a way that it becomes the basis of a new democratic international system.

Ultimately the only answer for a stable and prosperous planet will be a glob- al system that is structurally and morally similar to the American union—semi- autonomous states with secular, liberal democratic systems; where states have both prescribed rights and agreed upon responsibilities in a larger secular, liberal dem- ocratic framework; one equipped with checks and balances and meaningful insti- tutions; with governance based on rule of law and tolerant and pluralist values. In the second-part of his extended essay, published in the Winter 2004 issue of JINSA’s journal, Joffe pursued this line of thought further, expanding on his call for what he described as “an empire that looks like America.” 138

Amazingly, Joffe frankly talks about the United States engaging in massive imperial conquests in the trouble-torn regions of Africa—pre- sumably after the United States has already made havoc in the Arab coun- tries of the Middle East:

The conditions under which America and its allies would simply take over and restore African countries are far from clear. What are the thresholds for inter- vention? What are the procedures and outcomes? Who will fight and who will pay? The restoration of Africa would involve long-term commitments and immense costs, of the sort that could only be paid for by Africa itself. That is to say, it would probably require American economic control, to go along with political and cultural control. Colonialism is always pay as you go, and it is not pretty. The question is both whether Africa can pay the price (or afford not to) and whether America has the stomach.

Of course, Africa is not the only target of Joffe and his like-minded schemers (and that is precisely what they are, however, “extreme” that term may be perceived). In fact, Joffe talks of a wide-ranging global agenda—well beyond the African continent.

In the end, however, Joffe lets the cat out of the bag, about the real intentions of those who are using United States military power as the mechanism for a bigger agenda.

“New arrangements,” he says, “must come into being under American leadership to provide an alternative for states that are willing to accept rights and responsibilities.”

Joffe dreams of a United Nations that has been re-made under the imperial force of the United States. And ultimately, he predicts the possibility of a world government, writing:

Possibly, after a period of chaos and anger, which in any event would simply intensify existing states of being, the institution [the United Nations] might be bludgeoned into changing. [Note his use of the term “bludgeoned.”—MCP]

Rather than a club that admits all, the 21st century United Nations might— someday, somehow—be remade into an exclusive, by invitation, members-only group, of free, democratic states, sharing similar values. Or in the end, replaced by one. That day, however, may be decades off.

Should there be any doubt that he is talking about world government, note Joffe’s concluding words:

The best way to preserve the American empire is to eventually give it up.

Setting the stage for global governance can only be done with American leader- ship and American-led institutions of the sort schematically outlined here.

So it is. Despite all the high-sounding rhetoric about “democracy,” what it all comes down to—in the words of this pro-Israel ideologue—is the use of America’s military power to advance another (secret) agenda altogether. Even many of those grass-roots American flag-wavers (who may be genuine patriots) who relish the concept of an American empire may find Joffe’s concepts somewhat different from what they otherwise might perceive.

But here, in the pages of a devotedly pro-Zionist journal, we learn precisely what the “story behind the story” actually happens to be. It has nothing to do, really, even with a “strong America” or, for that matter, even with America itself.

The United States of America is simply a pawn—albeit a powerful one—in the game, being ruthlessly shifted about in a scheme for world dominance by an elite few operating behind the scenes. And, in the end, this does tell us very much about who The High Priests of War really are and what their agenda is really all about. There’s no mystery at all.

What remains to be determined is what the American people—and all other real patriots in nations around the globe—intend to do about it. The question is this: will the world finally decide it is time to declare war on The High Priests of War?