you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NomadMK15c 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

I've never heard of him before today.

He Is not a Journalist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I've never heard of him before today.

He Is not a Journalist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Pool

from that link:

Timothy Daniel Pool (born March 9, 1986) is an American journalist, YouTuber, and political commentator.

[–]NomadMK15c 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Spouting his opinon on youtube does not make him a journalist, where did Tim study journalism In college?

Oh, from that link he never went to college.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You provided a link, and the link YOU provided says the opposite.

[–]NomadMK15c 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Duh, In my "opinion" Tim Is not a journalist, spouting his "opinon" on you-tube does not make him a journalist.

Is Alex Jones a journalist? The answer Is no, Alex Jones Is just another Hate Monger. But that's just my opinion. :)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

...so, you don't believe him to be a journalist, however you provide a link that states otherwise. I believe that's what's called sending mixed signals, or did you not read the link you provided? ..or you didn't expect people to actually read it?

In those circumstances a link is expected to reinforce what you're saying instead of contradicting it.

[–]NomadMK15c 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I did read It, but what part of "my opinion" did you not understand? I also thought that you RePUGlicans did not like Wikipedia.

https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/2pc8/survey_shows_leftists_are_more_likely_to_have/95v8

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I also thought that you RePUGlicans did not like Wikipedia.

1- You misspeled republicans

2- Where did you get that I was a republican?

3- Gonna give you some advice, you need to take some time for self-reflection.

[–]NomadMK15c 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

1- You misspeled republicans

2- Where did you get that I was a republican?

3- Gonna give you some advice, you need to take some time for self-reflection.

1- It's just a play on words, RePUGlicans here sometimes use Libtards to slur Liberals, look It up. But you actually "misspeled" the word "misspelled"

2- I read your posting history here, I will say that you are not as nutty as many Republicans here on this forum. You're not from the United Sates, where are you from?

3- Good advice for the both of us.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1- It's just a play on words, RePUGlicans here sometimes use Libtards to slur Liberals, look It up.

That's called dragging down the pyramid of debate, in both cases.

2- I read your posting history here,

Totally not creepy /s

Post history is irrelevant to the things being discussed.

3- Good advice for the both of us.

Dude, if go back and read what I wrote, you'll see that I'm pointing out the contradiction between your "opinion" and the sources you cited that would be expect to support it. That's the online equivalent of telling you that your fly is open.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

it is odd tho to say a person is not a journalist then follow that up with a link saying he is a journalist. why do that.