More than 2 million voters approved North Carolina's voter ID amendment. One unelected Democratic judge threw it out.

submitted by useless_aether from dailysignal.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jamesK_3rd 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ahhh...

so the judges should legislate based upon some perceived or alleged past grievances..

I'll proffer that if it was a bill you agreed with, you might be ok with signing it quickly, so that you can later find out what's in it.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So somehow you have jumped right to putting words in my mouth? That seems rude.

[–]jamesK_3rd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To proffer: something proposed for acceptance by another

You think things are rude because you aren't looking at things truthfully, either because you don't know, or don't care to think about them, or you simply agree with something regardless because it fits a certain agenda or narrative.

[–]Nemacolin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So anyway, like I was saying, North Carolina has a long history of using various administrative procedures to ensure people could not vote.