you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Orangutan[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

True value added tax will be a part. But you'd have to spend an awful lot to offset the result of that tax which is $1,000 in your pocket a month. What's your solution to automation. We on the right course as you see it as we are?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

We could just fight one less war? Or make the wealthy pay for our deficits let's face it it's about 50% of our total money some say 70% they stop paying for that money that we borrowed in the first place for them. Can't feed us with a rigged economy. I will! Put it to you this way. My math is there are a 160 billion workers working everyday. Of that number we have 50% making less than 15 an hour. Thats 80 billion folks. If we simply raise the minimum wage passed by Congress. That boils done to 80billion people getting a five dollar an hour wage increase. By my shitty math 8*5 =40 that will add 400 million an hour of new money with no taxes. That's the economy you want.? What you do is white wash the real problem that we have not increased the wages in America. This is done with no new tax. Let me explain the volesity of that money each dollar we create and buy from the reserve. Will create 1000 dollars in productivity for America. That money will! Be spent local. Untill it ends its life in the hands of the very few. Never to be taxed again. Consumption taxes are evil. The rich don't consume enough. It is up to us to make the economy. Not from the top down. From the bottom up. Yang's plan is just fluff. Not needed now and way jumping the gun. 400million dollars an hour being spent in America well it has to go somewhere. It's going right into the economy with out the government having to do a thing. If you want more give every worker 10 bucks more an hour. Now you got no new taxes and a spending public that is how the economy should be growing your models refuse to accept a growing economy is better than a tax and a give away. 800 million an hour every hour. Or billions of dollars an hour being taken from the economy in taxes. That's how we fail. Getting that kinda grease into the hands of America by giving them a raise and protable healthcare will be much better. Than your give away. But it is a pipe dream untill he leaves the case and supports real change in America by backing Bernie. That's how he could help. Drop out and get this done.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

How about... Just stop borrowing money.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Love to, then how about you give me enough to thrive on. Your defense is clear to me you don't understand the money is borrowed when it's made. We don't have a red cent we didn't borrow. I'm fine with that approach as well. But that makes money useless for all of us. Do you want thunder done? I'm in!. Institute the wealth tax. All I'm saying is somebody has got to feed you. Better pay is like taxing them for the vacuum they created for us. Yang's plan is great just stupid 160 billion people say so. Drop out do it today. Money being spent is the answer you seek but are to stupid to realize if so they can and hordit while we pay the interest on that money for them. 400million dollars an hour. Who is borrowing what here? I say you are! Pay is no tax liquidity of the population is more important. It starts with spending their money correcting wage laws affording overtime getting PTO. Abandoning the health Care system we now have educating all. Or we could tax every body to give the rich our thousand a month anyway. Thats yang thinking.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry dude, but your government COULD make their own money instead of borrowing it from a private foreign bank. That's just a deal made to make a few banksters rich that is utterly disadvantageous to EVERYBODY ELSE.

Given your lack of education on the topic, I didn't read very far into your no-paragraphs diatribe.