you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mikipika 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

"always" and "retarded" are such strong words, did you vote for Trump? Even though I am undecided about him, I am certain that the freedom to post whatever you want, however old it is, is something we can all respect.

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm speaking about the op not anything to do with donald. People do have the freedom to post whatever they want, I agree, but the reverse is also true. I have the freedom to call posting a 3 year old news article retarded. Why waste people time? This is not good content. Me saying itd retarded is just an easy way of summing up that feeling.

[–]mikipika 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I suppose what I am asking for is your patience. Someone like me, who didn't see the article back when it first came out, might be interested in it anyway. I do think it's relevant to point out the age, and I thank you for that. Maybe more kindness? Cheers!

[–]astronautrob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I will give neither of those things. The fact is content from 3 years ago is not good & to see it on the front page makes saidit seem out of date or that people aren't really participating on the site. So no I don't think patience nor kindness factor in to this situation. Granted I could of picked nicer words to say the same thing but that doesn't change the fact that it's terribly old content which in&of itself makes it bad content. The fact that this dcjogger yahoo almost only posts old articles that seem to paint donald in a good light is even worse.

[–]mikipika 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wish you the best. Buh bye!