you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The problem is government still needs to regulate the private sector, no? And government is in bed with the greedy corporations, looters, and price fixers. If you wanted to impose better regulations you'd first have to rid of the incorporated state, ie, the UNITED STATES as a coporation and congress (star chamber). You'd have to prevent lobbyists and tacit contracts.

Then, only then would things change. The Federal teserve and treasury notes would also have to end and too with it permanent public debt. That would lower taxes to a co siderable amount, it would be enough for national defense but would probably not allow us to start wars without borrowing or indebting the public further and imposing more Taxes on them. That would thusly allow nearly free healthcare and much lower taxes on the public. And better yet, capitalism would still reign free but wouldn't be taken over by looters.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Well, this post was about blowing the whistle on the Orwellian psyop about ONE WORD and the humongous consequences it has on the ability of people to think about politics. Just imagine how fragile, in view of this, our societies are, ESPECIALLY after racial, ethnic and cultural dilutions. Before those, you could change the meaning of words and people would still understand each other.

Either way, on to your question. Socialism in and of itself isn't a solution. Not for the USA because as you put it the cronies and lobbies. It could never work. So first you would need a direct democracy such as exists in Switzerland. And secondly, you would need to distribute as much as possible of the Federal government's power back to the states and from the states to counties, cities or whatever other small division that makes sense. And then have another "neighborhood council" layer that takes most of the local decisions.

And of course eliminate private central banking as well as income taxes.

Then when that happens, if your neighbor who works for the local government suddenly buys a Bentley, what's going to happen? People will start asking questions. Accountability arises naturally.

It's not so much that regulations would be so different from one town to the next. They MIGHT be, but overall they won't, because people are people. The point is, if a big corporation wants a regulation to be changed, it has to negotiate with hundreds, maybe thousands of "governments". That takes more lobbies and money than anyone can handle. So at that point there is not enough concentration of resources and power to make cronyism and lobbies profitable. Poor corporations have to resort to being efficient and creative. And at that point, giant corporations are hugely disadvantaged, so they would also disappear.

Economies of scale are hugely overrated, whereas corruption and waste scale A LOT MORE quickly with a corporation's size than does any "efficiency advantage", which is also countered by an "adaptation disadvantage". Note that we are also entering in an era of massive automation, driving efficiency effectively through the roof.

So this era represents both an incredible threat to freedom and goodness, and also at the same time an incredible opportunity for people who believe in freedom, who have goodness within, to be able to finally have a world in their image.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Never said socialism in its legal term was the solution. The US already has socialist like programs and in fact runs on a mix of ism's, including Socialism, and capitalism, with cronyist, oligarchic, corpocratic, plutocratic, and fascist like tendencies. Authoritarian, bureaucratic COG laws and the centralization of government via the executive branch and presidential policy directives illustrates that just what you've stated, is what the US people need:

So first you would need a direct democracy such as exists in Switzerland. And secondly, you would need to distribute as much as possible of the Federal government's power back to the states and from the states to counties, cities or whatever other small division that makes sense. And then have another "neighborhood council" layer that takes most of the local decisions.

And of course eliminate private central banking as well as income taxes.


Of course, allodial title, outright owning your property as a soverign, not a CITIZEN (incorporated), would be the first step in this process (Switzerland does not do this), for so many people are broke and homeless or have very little money to own land or a home, even when working long hours. Then when you do acquire a home, on a downpayment many times predatory mortgage lenders will suffice for private credit control over your indebtedness at interest, hoping that you pay the principle twice over or more.

Sovereigns live in God's Law. And as sovereigns they live as a king did in England, not like those he enslaved in a feudal system which seems to be closer to happening in the US. So, Switzerlnad has good elements of a well managed system but America was founded on God's Law. We must uphold such a law for all peoples as citizens who are NOT INCORPORATED to a corporation, ie Sovereigns.

Decentralization is obviously the answer as well as bringing back state rights, all the way down to local towns, which would help to break up the centralized treasonous federal government.

A neighborhood council would be good but whose to say people will participate in these affairs? Today people ignore their communities altogether focusing on the drama of political theater or Football or a social media star they idolize.

I think public government sponsored school has deliberately led to the downfall of the US by way of demoralizing and ideologically subverting generations of kids. How to fix this unconcern for such affairs?

State enforced community programs by gun point! /s

Just kidding. We teach kids ethics, the judicial process, morals, God's Laws, law done the right way, real history (not social studies), community sponsored programs, etc. We teach them to think critically and then go further. We must rid of common core and no child left behind. For the younger generations are the future, so we must teach them these things, which oresently, we are not doing effectively.

Ridding of permanent public and national debt by ending the central banking scheme is an important step, but we must NOT let a civil war ensue, for UN peacekeepers will take over and subvert our country further, imposing charters that are staunchly against the constitution and the ideology of our founders.

It starts with critical thinking and education at a younrbg age. Unfortunately someone has hijacked schooling. Yes, Coleman, you unqualified Zionist shill, I'm talking about you!

Then when that happens, if your neighbor who works for the local government suddenly buys a Bentley, what's going to happen? People will start asking questions. Accountability arises naturally.

So what would happen? I don't know? I would end money speculaion, ie the financialization of money whilst producing absolutely nothing in the process. I don't care if people have more money than others but they should at least follow God's Law but unfortunately most don't.

They MIGHT be, but overall they won't, because people are people. The point is, if a big corporation wants a regulation to be changed, it has to negotiate with hundreds, maybe thousands of "governments". That takes more lobbies and money than anyone can handle. So at that point there is not enough concentration of resources and power to make cronyism and lobbies profitable. Poor corporations have to resort to being efficient and creative. And at that point, giant corporations are hugely disadvantaged, so they would also disappear.

Excellent solutioms. They then have the incentive to do good bussiness. Also, if the people completely outlawed government bailouts due to the poor decisions and outright looting and speculation fraud of criminals, such as healthcare insurance companies with taxpayers money, the would subsequently have to do good bussiness and not have the handicap to screw over millions and get bailed out. Again, allowing this would i crease the number of competing companies who would all love under these principles, fearing that if they mess up customers will go elsewhere, they couldn't turn to big daddy government for their handouts.

Again, all of this would allow good national defense based on an isolationish policy but likely, unfortunately in fact, other powers in in the multilateral world would monopolize the European energy market and the US economy would take a big hit.

So, trying to be as SELF-RELIANT as a country and people as possible is the best solution. Industry, Jobs, technology, and farming are very important, they are all outsourced or monopolized. Consumerism in cities is another big issue. We have obese people consuming at an unprecendented rate where 10% of people farm in rural areas, most of these people are now indebted to Bayer/Monsanto and are on welfare. Farmers keep declining and it isn't a job that will get you enough ml ey to sustain your livelihood without severe debt.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Lybia had a direct democracy with 0% interest rates on mortgages and a $50,000 grant to buy a house to couples getting married (for the first time). It worked well enough that the USA had to put an end to it.

And yes of course, sovereign citizens is something that has not been done and is long overdue. The US Constitution is flawed for not having been built around that idea. And of course nations should be self-reliant in the extent that it is feasible. Only NWO assholes say different.

But international trade is good stuff, provided laws prevent corporations from forming international conglomerates, and provided individuals aren't allowed controlling corporations outside their own borders. There is a theory of international commerce based on "comparative advantages" that works beautifully: Each nation can do more of what it's particularly good at than it needs, and engage in international trade. But right now the regulatory framework has all been corrupted to make this impossible and allow creation of abominations such as Monsanto, Amazon, Apple, Nike, and so on, and so forth.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That was when Gaddafi was in power though, no, and that was because their country was rich in oil.