you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Dragonerne[S] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Read culture of critique or mein kampf to understand how jews are different than non-jews. No, I am serious, if you are actually interested.

Jews have a very high level of ethnic nepotism, racism, paranoia, deceitfulness, disgusting morals/behaviours, etc.

ADL as an example is against ethnonationalism, except when it is jewish ethnonationalism, because then they are in favor of ethnonationalism. Jews are in general like that. "Rules for thee but not for mee"

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I can give you the first 3 without too much argument lol but implying all non-jews are morally good people and there are no morally good jews is where i draw the line. As for the ethnonationalism stuff, i don't think ADL takes much issue with other ethnostates like korea/japan/china. Thing is, ADL is american defamation league and it's 1 of America's defining traits for a while now that it's a melting pot. So talking about America being more ethno-nationalist is obviously very anti-american-minorities, and ADL is all about protecting american minorities so i don't rly sense a conspiracy there.

[–]Dragonerne[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

America is not a melting pot. The US was started as a republic for free white men of good character. The melting pot idea has been promoted by jews, like the jew that wrote the "give us the worlds poor etc" on the freedom statue, and you are right that the ADL wants to promote minorities (nonwhites) in America, but in Israel they want to promote the jews, not the minorities.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't see any of that in the Constitution.

[–]Dragonerne[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

It is in the naturalization act of 17XX something

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1790, that was after the fact. A lot of the revolutionaries began doubting or opposing it in private, even some of the Federalists. But at the time the masses wouldn't have even considered accepting the new nation if they didn't pass it. There's a reason why they didn't include it in the Constitution.