you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Do aid workers and agency capture have a place in your list? https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/south-asia/former-high-profile-un-aid-official-peter-john-dalglish-jailed-for-child-abuse-in It lists two others at the end besides Dalglish.

Also, "Father" Bruce Ritter and Covenenat house (more agency capture). I totally remember the ads for covenant house on tv when I was a kid (shudder). https://nypost.com/2018/09/13/this-nyc-priests-dramatic-downfall-was-just-the-beginning-of-perv-priest-scandals/

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Most certainly welcomed. They will be added.

I've been revising the article.

I want to leave it alone, but I also figure now is the best time to clean it up for folks while awareness is high.

I'm less interested in forming great paragraphs on an ugly topic than just having the information aggregated and reasonably ordered to prove that it's systematic and an open secret.

I may even fold the two lists into the already long article. I came up with a colour code: red guilty, orange accused, yellow intrigue, green exposure. Then I could apply a timeline to all areas of abusive power. (It would also make it easier to edit.)