you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Once I saw the FBI spreadsheet of organized symbols and codewords, I began seeing them in both huge and small corporations/companies pretty commonly... That was part of how Comet Ping Pong Pizza was first discovered for investigation by people on Voat and the Chans a few years back. That lead down a crazy fucking rabbit hole, hence "Pizzagate".

Then Podesta's e-mails came out via wikileaks validating the Comet Ping Pong, James Alefantis political connection despite seeming like a random pizza-shop, no longer turning it into a theory, but a real conspiracy. And again, the appearance of code words being used in context w/ children as well as taxpayer dollars to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars being used for Obama's "private, personal parties" (it's not normal to use tax-payer money for a personal parties or to purchase that many hot dogs/pizza/food from out of state within 12 hours, and "farmers transporting young children" with "given names" for "entertainment"? why are politicians receiving information about that directly.. why aren't organizations that help rescue children receiving these type of updates/managing the correspondences and why are they cryptic, unless it's something nefarious/supposed to be under the table, as all these emails were intended/thought to be classified.. who the fuck has a "map of pizza" unless you suffer from ASD or have OCD and are fucking obsessed with pizza and map out the best spots.. the connection to the words "pizza" and "hot dog" with children pops up so often in the rest of the e-mails, and having 3 children who "will FOR SURE be in the pool for your entertainment", send to a politician, isn't weird at all? The same one who has maps of pizzas? Also note the domain the Obama e-mail originates from: www.stratfor.com).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpet67TTVag

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

and why are they cryptic, unless it's something nefarious/supposed to be under the table, as all these emails were intended/thought to be classified..).

The fact that they're assumed classified and ambiguously cryptic is a dead giveaway.

Great comment! +3

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In my eyes too! Thank you, great post!