you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fizzyj[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

what about recombination between snakes and bats?

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1002/jmv.25682

that's less conspiracy fueld than other methods but ig uess

[–]fizzyj[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

From that blog though

The high sequence similarity of INS1378 to a SARS spike protein (2; IPAK Confirmed).

That causes sensitivity when introduced as a vaccine.

[–]fizzyj[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This refutes that blog.

https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/2019-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-does-not-contain-pshuttle-sn-sequence-no-evidence-that-virus-is-man-made/

But ncov2019 uses spike protein, which causes sensitivity

2019-nCoV S shares 98% sequence identity with the S protein from the bat coronavirus RaTG13, with the most notable variation arising from an insertion in the S1/S2 protease cleavage site that results in an “RRAR” furin recognition site in 2019-nCoV (19), rather than the single arginine in SARS-CoV (fig. S5)

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/02/19/science.abb2507

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2020/02/19/science.abb2507

[–]fizzyj[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The high affinity of 2019-nCoV S for human ACE2 may contribute to the apparent ease with which 2019-nCoV can spread from human-to-human (1), however, additional studies are needed to investigate this possibility.