The best argument I have heard so far for getting the COVID vaccine

submitted by trident765 from (self.nonmorons)

sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

I would like to see the chicken study. Obviously a lot depends on the type of virus and the protein that the mRNA produces.

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I haven't read through it but I found this:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

I am not sure if it is the same study but I am guessing that it is. The study doesn't mention mRNA vaccines, but if the COVID vaccine doesn't kill the virus then the same principle applies.

[–]Ponderer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's a very troubling study. Would it be possible for you to contact your uncle and ask him if this is the one?

Also, what are his thoughts on the mRNA vaccine being used in basically a sociopathic way?

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes this isn't an mRNA vaccine and on that basis alone the study doesn't apply. But in fact the underlying logic of the paper doesn't apply to covid. The basic idea of the paper is that in the case where a virus kills unvaccinated hosts faster than vaccinated hosts kill the virus then the vaccine will increase transmission to the unvaccinated. This is obviously logical. But none of this applies to covid because it is the opposite case. An insignificant fraction of those infected with covid die, and we don't know how fast those with immunity kill the virus. So this study doesn't apply to covid at all.

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I forgot to mention my uncle said the danger would become more serious when they start giving booster shots for deadly variants.

It makes sense to me. When the deadly variant is reported in the news, people will be begging for its vaccine, no matter how rare the variant is. Then the government and pharmaceutical companies throwing ethics aside will give the people what they want, allowing this deadly variant to spread. Now the people of the world will have to pay pharmaceutical companies a monthly tax on life.

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But there are no really deadly variants, and it is very unlikely that there ever will be. The government lies about the mortality rate along with paying hospitals to kill people and call it a covid death. For the few unvaccinated people who are at risk because they are unhealthy, they can easily prevent covid prophylactically or treat it early using common medicines that governments are suppressing. This applies to all covid variants. On the other hand the vaccines have the potential to do enormous harm. Look for videos of Dr Vladimir Zelenko and Michael Yeadon for more. At this point I am quite optimistic that the vaccines will kill billions of morons over the next few years and significantly improve the human gene pool.