Why are Jews parasitic?

submitted by fschmidt from (happierabroad.com)

all 19 comments
sorted by:
new (suggested)
topinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know why.

[–]Good-Education-7855 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The Irish are a parasite race. They contribute nothing, but leach resources from genetically and culturally superior breeds of men.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I don't have an opinion on jews, but I was wondering if you met your wife on that site.

[–]RuckusChan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I seen this site a few months back while I dont agree with everything on this site, its interesting and calls out the trashy attitude of American feminists.

[–]fschmidt[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

No

[–]superfox 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

across the board, every human is a parasite.

[–][deleted]  (15 children)

[deleted]

    [–]fschmidt[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

    If you are going to argue that the cause is genetic, then you have to show why the cause isn't religious. You don't do this.

    In addition the analogy is weak. The brood parasite strategy is employed by humans but not by Jews. This is the strategy of sexual degenerates, and liberalism exists largely as an intellectual rationalization of sexual degeneracy as explained by E. Michael Jones.

    The Jewish strategy is basically cultural warfare based on viewing non-Jews as subhumans. But all people are capable of viewing others as subhuman as is common in war. The Talmud simply instills this view in Jews through religion. Jews who are not (indirectly) exposed to Talmudic thought don't have this view. For example racial Jews who left Judaism to pursue science or math are not parasitic. I challenge you to find an example of parasitic behavior in leading jewish scientists or mathematicians.

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    I challenge you to find an example of parasitic behavior in leading jewish scientists or mathematicians.

    Tom Lehrer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXlfXirQF3A
    Einstein: https://christiansfortruth.com/albert-einstein-plagiarist-and-fraud/
    David Reich: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html

    The list is endless.

    I can see that you see subversive and parasitic as two different things, but in the context of jewry I don't think there is a distinction to be made between the two. One is a tool to achieve the other. Jews that "convert" to Catholicism aren't jews. They are Christians. That's the whole point of Jesus.

    [–]fschmidt[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

    You first example is a Tom Lehrer song? Seriously? Your third example is David Reich who is obviously scum, so I won't discuss him. Einstein is a valid example of a jewish scientist, and the criticism that you link to is absurd. Olinto De Pretto arrived at E=MC2 using the idea of ether which is no longer considered a valid concept. So his derivation isn't conclusive. Einstein derived this formula in a completely different way, using general relativity which is accepted because experiments show it to be valid. So this isn't plagiarism.

    I can see that you see subversive and parasitic as two different things

    Yes, parasitic is subversive, but subversive isn't necessarily parasitic. Subversive is only parasitic if it benefits the subversive person.

    Jews that "convert" to Catholicism aren't jews. They are Christians. That's the whole point of Jesus.

    That's progress, and different from what you said before because it is based on religion, not race. So then what about a Jew that converts to Islam. Is he a Jew? If not, what about a Jew that rejects Judaism and follows something else?

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    You first example is a Tom Lehrer song? Seriously?

    Yeah, Tom Lehrer is an example of a mathmatician who is subversive and promotes degenerate morality.

    Your third example is David Reich who is obviously scum, so I won't discuss him

    His behaviour is subversive. He wants to control the narrative of race so "racists" don't get to define the narrative.

    Einstein is a valid example of a jewish scientist, and the criticism that you link to is absurd.

    We will have to agree to disagree. He is a plagiarist, fraud and more.
    I am not good enough at physics to say that the ether is false, but I know that the best christian physicists at the time disagreed with Einstein back then and considering how much Jews lie and control the universities I wouldn't be surprised if relativity and everything around it is fraudulent. Just like how jews subverted biology and the concept of race. They are STILL trying to claim that race is just a social construct.
    Considering, that I am qualified to prove them wrong on this subject, I am hesitant to believe that the ether has been debunked.

    Yes, parasitic is subversive, but subversive isn't necessarily parasitic. Subversive is only parasitic if it benefits the subversive person.

    Yes, we can agree on that.

    That's progress, and different from what you said before because it is based on religion, not race.

    Nope, that's race. The jews that don't "convert" weren't Jews to begin with, they are children of Satan.

    So then what about a Jew that converts to Islam. Is he a Jew? If not, what about a Jew that rejects Judaism and follows something else?

    Still Jewish in the modern sense. From a Christian perspective, they're children of the devil. From a Christian perspective, then if someone is truly racially Jewish, then they will believe in Jesus Christ, when they hear his words. Someone who does not hear his words, do not hear them, because the person wasn't Jewish to begin with. He just called himself Jewish. In fact his father is the devil. The father of lies.

    [–]fschmidt[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    I didn't even know that Tom Lehrer was a mathematician. I said "leading" which Tom Lehrer wasn't. Neither is David Reich. There are no significant scientists or mathematicians in our current moronic times.

    My father was physicist so he was part of this community. Among physicists, religion was a non-issue. In fact I can't even imagine a serious Jew (follower of Judaism) being a serious scientist since the values are so far apart. Most physicists, regardless of background, recognized Einstein's work.

    Nope, that's race. The jews that don't "convert" weren't Jews to begin with, they are children of Satan.

    You almost sound Muslim here. The Muslim call converts "reverts" based on the theory that they were Muslim at heart.

    Still Jewish in the modern sense. From a Christian perspective, they're children of the devil. From a Christian perspective, then if someone is truly racially Jewish, then they will believe in Jesus Christ, when they hear his words. Someone who does not hear his words, do not hear them, because the person wasn't Jewish to begin with. He just called himself Jewish. In fact his father is the devil. The father of lies.

    This is very confusing because you are giving 2 meanings to "Jewish". You need distinct words to make your meaning clear.

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    Neither is David Reich

    Yes he is.

    Most physicists, regardless of background, recognized Einstein's work.

    Most biologists preach the anti racist religion too. Again I am not qualified to debunk it at all, so this is merely me projecting the lies of biology, mainstream news, subversion of christianity, etc. onto physics. If they lie everywhere, why not physics too? Especially considering that some INSANE geniuses of that time were against Einsteins ideas. It is not a big stretch to think that some experiments that disproved the jewish wonderchilds theories got censored by the jewish owned news and jewish owned universities.

    You almost sound Muslim here. The Muslim call converts "reverts" based on the theory that they were Muslim at heart.

    It is basically the same idea.

    This is very confusing because you are giving 2 meanings to "Jewish". You need distinct words to make your meaning clear.

    I don't know how to say it better. Modern Jews are Fake Jews. They call themselves jews but they aren't jews. They are basterds, mamzers, mixed race, half breeds, mudbloods- or in the words of Jesus: children of the devil.
    Real Jews can hear the words of Jesus and hence become Christians; Israelites.

    Is it any wonder "Jews" and Christians have been at war for 2000 years? Imagine if you were a religious Jew. How would you feel if someone else told you that you aren't Gods chosen people. In fact they say that you are Satans children. That you are liars etc.
    Wouldn't feel very good, would it?

    [–]fschmidt[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    I don't know how to say it better. Modern Jews are Fake Jews. They call themselves jews but they aren't jews. They are basterds, mamzers, mixed race, half breeds, mudbloods- or in the words of Jesus: children of the devil. Real Jews can hear the words of Jesus and hence become Christians; Israelites.

    How about these terms: "Israelites" for the people of the Old Testament. "Jews" for modern Jews. And "Christians" as the successors of Israelites from a Christian perspective. The Hebrew word for "jew" doesn't appear in the Old Testament until the end. It was Ezra who changed the Israelite religion and made it racist, which was the beginning of Judaism.

    Is it any wonder "Jews" and Christians have been at war for 2000 years? Imagine if you were a religious Jew. How would you feel if someone else told you that you aren't Gods chosen people. In fact they say that you are Satans children. That you are liars etc.

    E. Michael Jones covers this conflict fairly well. I commented on this view here.

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    I read your reddit post. I liked your analysis. I think Christianity is itself a revolutionary spirit, not simply "tradition". In this sense it fits well within in the jewish tradition of cultural revolt.
    No one rejects authority more than Christians. Jesus is the ultimate revolutionary against any civilized nation.
    He teaches his followers that they must reject ALL materialism and take on a sword and die for him to spread the Truth (his Word). He rejects all centralisation, especially of money.
    On top of this he teaches people how to breed and multiply like cattle, which is one way to win a cultural battle.

    The many civil wars in China were caused by Christianity getting popular over there. It is a good religion to destroy civilizations from within.

    [–]fschmidt[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think you are defining "revolutionary" differently from Jones, but otherwise I agree. The core idea of good religion is to put God above Man, which always results in revolt against unjust human authority.

    [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    "Israelites" for the people of the Old Testament

    Jews/Judeans is one of the 12 tribes of the Israelites.

    "Jews" for modern Jews

    Modern jews aren't the Judean/Jewish tribe of the Israelites. They are Khazars/Edomites and others.

    And "Christians" as the successors of Israelites from a Christian perspective

    Both words can be used interchangably.

    No matter how you look at it, it wont be easy to get proper labels, because whatever you choose will be controversial.

    [–]fschmidt[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Jews/Judeans is one of the 12 tribes of the Israelites.

    They WERE 1.5 tribes (Judah and half of Benjamin).

    Modern jews aren't the Judean/Jewish tribe of the Israelites. They are Khazars/Edomites and others.

    Like the modern English aren't the Anglo-Saxons. Throughout history, races mix. Am I descended from Khazars or Edomites? I don't know and I don't care. I only care about who I am now.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]fschmidt[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      This comment makes me question your knowledge of the Old Testament and the Talmud. I hope you are willing to follow though on this debate to its conclusion. This sub is not like /s/debatealtright with its intolerably low average IQ. Here I welcome intelligent debate from all points of view.

      I think I should give my background so that you know where I am coming from. I am racially jewish and was raised atheist with no exposure to jewish religion or culture. My father was part of the Hungarian upper class and had a German nanny as most of the Hungarian upper class did. I would say that I was raised with a mix of American and upper class European values. Being naturally curious, I explored all major western religions including Judaism. With my racial pass I was able to attend orthodox synagogue and classes on Judaism there. In addition I paid for personal classes with the rabbi. So I think I have a better inside view of Judaism than most critics of Judaism have.

      My conclusion of my investigation of Judaism was that I hate Judaism and the Talmud, but I love the Old Testament. It makes perfect sense to me that the dominant religion of Europe during its peak (Christianity) would include the Old Testament in its scripture. Your comments about the Old Testament are just wrong and I would gladly answer any specific questions you have. You could just as well ask any well-informed Christian and he would also be able to answer your questions. I list some resources about the Old Testament versus the Talmud here.

      I don't know much about Stephen Jay Gould, but many jewish scientists were certainly liberal. Liberalism is subversive but is not parasitic. So this doesn't support your position that Jews are genetically parasitic. Of course not all jewish scientists were liberal. For example John von Neumann had a similar background to mine and was very conservative (and he converted to Catholicism).

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]fschmidt[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Am I literally the last person on Earth willing to engage in intelligent debate? It seems that way.