you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

The title is misleading.

The article should read, "Why The Fuck Was A 96 Year Old Judge Presiding Over This Case".

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

right?!?