all 6 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

The title is misleading.

The article should read, "Why The Fuck Was A 96 Year Old Judge Presiding Over This Case".

[–]FormosaOolong 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

right?!?

[–]FormosaOolong 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I was all What?!? Noooooooo..... Until I read he was 96

[–]send_nasty_stuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Doesn't matter how old he was. It's still highly suspicious.

[–]magnora7[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He was 96 so not all that unusual I guess, but still...

[–]HumanBN 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, US life expectancy: 78,69 yrs.