Yup, I'm starting to question if any of these events are truly real anymore. I know for sure Brussels was a hoax, this can be demonstrably proven through G4S contracts and hidden camera footage showing moulage, mock victims and even paraplegics playing parts. It was out in the open; overt for anybody who wanted to search and see, they could find it -- that is before the 1984 censorship fiasco. Indeed, that was and still is the desired solution. That they memorhole and scrub all raw videos depicting overt moulage fakery, i.e, event drill participants.

They can create thousands of mock victims too, it is even written in the declassified Operation Northwoords DoD document. Hundreds of 'mock victims' and 'fake vigils/funerals' would be propagandized and televised to induce a desired social behavioral, socioeconomic or geopolitical agenda. That was in the 1960's, rest assured they have the will and tech to fake things at the 33rd degree -- pun intended, not sure if that is even a pun.

So, the ONLY way to know for sure if these events are indeed real is to see all the footage, not just the manipulated OFFICIAL footage. Photos tell a thousand stories and yet the objective truth might be hidden elsewhere. Photos can be staged, so it is important to PIECE TOGETHER A NARRATIVE. Real events DO NOT HAVE FABRICATIONS AND GAPING PLOT-HOLES. For example, researching the Fort Lauderdale shooting we find the AGENDA overtly open in the future passing of legislation. This is the motive. The antithesis. To ALLOW open carry in airports is the bill soon to be signed; to be voted on in Florida, two days AFTER the alleged handgun shooting in a Fort Lauderdale Florida airport.

Now for the gaping plot holes. The msnbc/CNN/FOX/local news photographers, videographers are AT THE SCENE as the shooting transpired. How is this possible? We have AP photos of the shooting as eyewitnesses scamble from the scene. The SAME AP photographers/so called journalists that just so happen to be at other world wide PSYOP events as they unfold. Frome Brussels to NICE, to Paris they are there capturing footage as the events unfold. How is this possible? How is it possible that media is at the scene filming scrambling witnesses as the shooting transpires? They, the media, do not seemed botherd by a lone gunman not even 100' away from where they are positioned. Their goal was ONLY TO CAPTURE FAKE TERROR acted out by drill participants. Now how do I know they were drill participants? Because the entire event that I just explained transpired in a different terminal a 1000 plus yards away from where officer Israel said it occured. That is, in an entirely different terminal not even connected to this one. If you do not research you would never know this. And even more hilarious is that the timeline makes even less sense as the shooter was captured at 1:30 but the media footage was live at around 2-2:25. And the DRILL PARTICIPANTS ALL SCREAMED, "He's shooting again!"

How would they know this? They were not even in the same terminal, and he was supposedly already detained. Real narratives do not have contradicting plot holes, Drills, however, with the use of perception management do!

Then you have santa clause guy doing al these interview on cnn saying how he was right near the shooter yet he was in a different terminal, closed off, most likely to conduct the drill. ANNNND he happened to be on an TLC tv show a year before, lol.

And also research if medical injuries are legitimate with their stories. Injected drama will surely bring a more clearer conclusion, whether an event is real, narratives and timelines lineup or fake, they are conflicting and make zero sense. This was done by UK Critical thinker concerning the Brussels bombing and the drill becomes painfully obvious. They even were caught at Brussels using past terrorist footage as real footage for the Event.