you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Theo_Fridall 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

1) Eight simultaneous bogus events?

2) How was NZ "demonstrably" a hoax? Can you demonstrate for me?

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

Look up uk critical thinker fort lauderdale shooting videos. That single series, around 2hrs long will show how US and world wide drill psyops are conducted.

[–][deleted]  (14 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Jesus 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

    Altaccount. /u/magnora7

    And, NZ probably was not a hoax, there are many anomalies though in the official timeline illustrating agency involvement.

    Calling someone a nutjob is a fallacy.

    [–][deleted]  (9 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

      I wonder how the weather is in Tel Aviv today.

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        What a disgusting piece of shit you are.

        Please respect the pyramid of debate on saidit, thank you.

        https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

        [–][deleted]  (2 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]5Nco2VME7FpWVbuS 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

          Or maybe, and hear me out here, you're a delusional nut job.

          It doesn't matter what kind of proof I give because your brain is clearly not operating on a level to understand it.

          What a disgusting piece of shit you are. I feel sorry for you family.

          1, 2, 3 strikes you're out at the old ball game~

          [–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

          You were a star in debate class, weren't you?

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Exactly...

          [–]HopeThatHalps 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          People who deny these tragedies happened can't emotionally deal with it. Their conspiracy theories save them from having to face the grim reality we live in.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          IUndeniable Proof: CGI Used in New Zealand Shooting (video link restored)

          FORENSIC ANALYSIS:

          Now let me first start out by saying that after thoroughly examining the 17 minute video of the shooter frame-by-frame, and after applying deductive reasoning in the forensic analysis, I am convinced this was a false-flag event for the following reasons:

          No bullet holes or shattered wood or glass or clouds of sheet rock or exploding plaster or cement can be observed or heard as the guns are firing into them and the victims. This is possible only when no solid projectile is fired from the muzzle, which means no solid bullets were fired into the walls, doors, windows, or victims bodies—only the concussion of air—which means either blanks or paint or gas or other non-solid projectiles were fired from the guns. This means, essentially, nothing solid impacted the victims bodies, therefore no physical damage resulted, which means no living person was lethally wounded or killed by an outside force. It’s simple physics, which Newton’s law establishes in the theorem: a body at rest stays at rest; a body in motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. Applied to this situation, we might similarly establish that a living body remains living unless impacted by an outside force that lethally disrupts the body’s life processes, such as a bullet destroying arteries and vital organs.
          No blood splatter from the close-range impact of the high-caliber bullets upon the victims can be observed anywhere on the walls, doors, floors or furniture. Several of the victims are shot at point-blank range as they are crawling or passing by the shooter, yet no visual impact of the bullets can be observed, which would have undoubtedly “kicked” or “thrown” the victim with tremendous force. Only one victim lying on the ground appears to have a red spray appear next to his head as he is allegedly shot, but this could be explained as a “paint round”, since no physical impact of the bullet or explosion upon the head is observed.
          Additionally, no pools of blood can be seen either around the bodies on the floor after being shot, except from one body which strangely appears lying next to the first victim in the doorway, which was not present when the shooter initially entered. So this suggests the body or actor was placed in that position, with blood added afterwards.

          Demonstrably a hoax.

          [–]FormosaOolong 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          seriously scraping the bottom of the debate pyramid here, pal.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

          UK critical thinker? Never heard of 'em...

          Cover me. I'm goin in!!!

          [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          He's great, watch Manchester on the face of it, doc. His videos are long and detailed. Anyone, even the sleeping could watch his investigative videos and attain a new perspective.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          He's really measured and thorough. I watched about 15 of his videos. I'm hooked.

          I found one particularly interesting video. I'll following up on referenced material.

          [–]Theo_Fridall 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

          Sure, will do. I love that stuff. that said, back to my question:

          How was NZ "demonstrably" a hoax? Can you demonstrate for me?

          [–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          Oh, I can prove many events are and were hoaxes, however, I do not know if NZ was one.

          [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          [–][deleted]  (1 child)

          [deleted]