you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

The parkland shooting was a drill, nobody died. Duping Delight everywhere.

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I know that and you know that but I am just dealing with one piece of Operation Mockingbird here.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I know here's some great videos regarding Parkland:


Victims confirmed dead by Sheriff Israel long, long before it was later reported they died.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iGpsZuWRrPZW/

Animation released by Broward Sheriff’s Office does not match what we had been previously told regarding where in the building the shooting had occurred and where victims died.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EZ999zqN1Zut/

[–]hennaojisan 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Both are really good vids that I had not seen before. Do you think they goof up simple information like this, just to grind our gears? They had plenty of time to get their stories straight but still failed to get it right. And according to the animation, the shooter had lots of targets that he did not take out. Why? The video I like is the one where you see the father of a girl who was "killed" the day before. Yet he was smiling and laughing with some other men just as he was called to the mike, and you can see clearly that he is getting into character by looking sorrowful just before he speaks. Thanks for that and good work.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Do you think they goof up simple information like this, just to grind our gears?

Yes and no... The real reason is an established practice in PSYOP's called the 'ambiguity method' in Perception Management. Look up perception management on wiki. They intentionally, put out conflicting story lines, injected conflicting drama, in order to confuse and disengage investigators from coming to a well purposed truth. If nothing makes sense, than what really is the truth? Cognitive dissonance will take a laypersons's mind because they will not accept that the entire shooting was a PSYOP, a hyperactive drill and nothing more. They are using perception management tactics because it IS a PSYOP.

They had plenty of time to get their stories straight but still failed to get it right.

Done on purpose.

And according to the animation, the shooter had lots of targets that he did not take out. Why?

Because it is a fabricated animation. There is recently released footage of Cruz, (who was drugged at the scene.) Take a look at the footage of Cruz as they get him into the police car. He can not even keep his head from falling over.

That being said the school footage, suppose to be in HD as the cameras are HD, but they uploaded them as less than 360, intentionally of course, shows Cruz with a gun go throughout the class rooms. The problem is the entire timeliens and what we were told in this footage ans animation and the police record is EVEN MORE CONFLICTING.

We are then told Cruz leaves with all the fleeign people during the fire alarm. Well the footage shows him leave when the FREAKING SUN IS GOING DOWN, and NO BODY is around him as he leaves, the surviellance camera. I know why of course. I gave the footage to a photoshop professional, and he as well as his other buddies said the footage of him running outside is fake and he is masked in. It is actually laughably bad, so bad in fact that they had to completely change the timeline when cruz left, which again makes ZERO SENSE. They did this because they could not mask him in with all the other fleeing students, it would look way too obvious that he was masked in.

So, it was a drill, students said the police were in the building firing blanks, many students thought it was real, because the school and police said a hyperactive drill was planned that day, but then magically it turns out to be real, with dozens of conflicting narratives, and timelines.

There are many more videos from other content creators. What's funny is there's no ranting in these videos, no crazy conspiracy talk, jsut reinforcing what the media told us. IF YOU RESEARCH, dilligently, and follow the court records, police documents and timelines, you'll discover sundry anomalies and inconsistencies, the narrative of a TRUE story is altogether different than that of a fabricated one.

That is a juxtaposition never to be crossed. The majority of people will read headliens and that's it. These researchers have gone far and beyond that and expose what these high profile shootings really are. Look up UK critical Thinker if you have not already, he's also a great researcher.

The video I like is the one where you see the father of a girl who was "killed" the day before. Yet he was smiling and laughing with some other men just as he was called to the mike, and you can see clearly that he is getting into character by looking sorrowful just before he speaks. Thanks for that and good work.

Are you referencing Sandy Hook?

[–]hennaojisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, there are so many and I get those two mixed up sometimes. Was it the Sandy Hook parents who had their mortgages paid off?

I'm in a different time zone and just woke up. 7:45 AM here and still on my first cup of coffee, but I'm very interested. I didn't know it was called "ambiguity method" but have seen it in many cases. The first was JFK where they almost overdid it with so many false leads and alternatives. I think they even got Steven King to write the book 11/22/63 that follows the official story to the letter. It's only a few years old but they want younger people to read that and accept it as fact. There is even a replica of the JFK car in some museum that has no Gov. Connelly seat in it at all. No middle seat.

Also, I think they are using the so-called Mandela Effect to confuse people into accepting revisionist history.

Give me a while to wake up. The saidit atmosphere is so open and accepting. and I'll be with you

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not sure, Sandy Hook was a DHS drill, everyone benefited from it, especially the school board. They planned it back in 2008. Most of the expose articles and videos are gone, the truth movement has been hijacked. I would listen to everything and believe nothing, there's so many cointelpro and shills on the internet and elsewhere that it is hard to trust information. Much has been tainted. I'd refer you to some videos but most of them are now scrubbed. Now who would do that??

The Mandela effect and flat earth are promoted by YouTube, I wonder why? Maybe it is because they serve as dumb conspiracy theories to stupify a newly awakened one. The only thing flat earth accomplished was media publicity and the censorship of real truth. If you have an account, see the content creators youtube promotes to YOU, 95% of them, even if they speak some truth are likely shills.

Revisionism and the historical review of events should be allowed. Seems like they do not want people question the past either. I would stay well away from mandela effect and flat earth. There are many conspiracies injected into the truth movement to disengage and waste peoples' time.

[–]hennaojisan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. If someone even mentions flat earth I think: nut job. It gives conspiracy people a bad name, even among other conspiracy folks. Same for Mandela. Reddit was crawling with shills and they will be here pretty soon. You're doing good work. Thanks.