news

news

ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun 13 days ago

He wasn't defending himself.

  1. Perry had made multiple posts and direct messages on social media expressing his desire to shoot Black Lives Matter protesters, writing in messages, "I might have to kill a few people on my way to work, they are rioting outside my apartment complex," and "I might go to Dallas to shoot looters."

  2. Perry had stated that someone could shoot protesters and get away with it by claiming self-defense.

  3. There was no evidence that Foster had pointed his weapon, and other eyewitnesses contradicted Perry's account that he had. AS did the fact that Foster's weapon was recovered with its safety on and no cartridge in the chamber, so it would not have made sense for him to point his weapon.

The jury were correct. And the sentencing was reasonable.

IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun 13 days ago

Hmm. That makes things a lot less clear.

ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun 12 days ago

The jury found it perfectly clear.

So do I.