you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The world was a better place when we still put criminals, especially violent criminals, behind bars for a long time

You think its a good idea to put non-violent criminals behind bars for a long time for minor offenses where nobody was hurt?

How very Christian of you. Remember what the Lord says: "if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, lock him up in jail for thirty years".

[–]Scolias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I'm not a Christian. And yes, lock em up. A threat of attack is almost as bad as an actual attack, and an attempted attack is somewhere inbetween. Put them away.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

A threat of attack is almost as bad as an actual attack, and an attempted attack is somewhere inbetween.

An "attempted attack" is an actual attack, just one which didn't succeed.

I feel that anyone with your attitude is a hair-trigger away from an actual attack, so I guess we ought to lock you away for the threat of an attack.

[–]Scolias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah that's not how reality works retard. How are you this stupid?

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yeah that's not how reality works retard.

Exactly: in reality we don't imprison people for not hurting somebody. This guy didn't hurt anyone. Treating him as a dangerously vicious criminal because he might have hurt somebody is not how the justice system works, and if he was white, you would 100% agree that he deserves a second chance.

[–]Scolias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Exactly: in reality we don't imprison people for not hurting somebody.

Yeah, we do retard. What the fuck do you think attempted murder is? If you shoot at someone and miss you still go to jail you dumbass.

Holy fuck think before you speak fucktard.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If you shoot at someone and miss you still go to jail you dumbass.

Even Florida, which has some of the strictest laws regarding gun crimes in the USA, allows probation for assault with a firearm under some circumstances.

The courts have many punishments available to them aside from prison. Attempted murder is usually considered a very serious crime in and of itself deserving a prison sentence, but this wasn't attempted murder.

Aside from prison, courts can and do sentence people to suspended sentences, community correction orders, home detention, fines or other sentences depending on the circumstances and severity of the crime, the likelihood of rehabilitation, the previous character of the convicted person, any previous criminal record, the presence of aggravating or mitigating factors, whether the accused exhibits remorse, etc. Some jurisdictions (e.g. Singapore) allow corporal punishment as an alternative to prison.

In this case the person is a veteran who has served his country and the court believes that if he gets treatment for his PTSD and drug abuse he is not likely to re-offend. Who the fuck are you, who knows nothing about the case or the person, to say they're wrong?

Prison is not always the best or only option. That's the whole point -- especially in the USA, where your prisons are completely fucked up and people come out of them worse than when then go in. If you want to fuck somebody up so that they become an even worse criminal, and screw what that does to society, you send them to prison.

[–]Scolias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm aware of what happens now. I'm saying it's retarded and they all belong in jail for life or given lethal injection.