use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
US Christian group accused of covering up sexual abuse of minors
submitted 1 year ago by ActuallyNot from theguardian.com
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (3 children)
re-read my original comment.
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
I've re-read it and my questions are largely the same:
I've seen accounts on Reddit saying the same thing you are
Saying what?
That covering up sexual abuse is a problem, or that most babies die in the womb if you count prior to 12 weeks?
Make it about Christians and turn the tables when people claim LGBTQ grooms
That's the wrong way around though, isn't it. You're blaming a problem that is related to religiosity on LGBTQ people, who are no more likely to be child molesters than the general public.
you my friend should go back.
Your opinion is noted. The fact that it doesn't seem to be based in reality is also noted.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
You're doing same thing as happened to me on reddit: look at all these Christian church abusers. Take the eye off of LGBT and put it on these Christians over here. You have an agenda. Nope. You will not get away with minimizing the rainbow crowd's participation.
https://reduxx.info/
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
You're doing same thing as happened to me on reddit: look at all these Christian church abusers.
Do you look at them?
Take the eye off of LGBT and put it on these Christians over here.
Did you read that paper I linked to?
You appear to disagree with the finding: "Using the data from our study, the 95% confidence limits, of the risk children would identify recognizably homosexual adults as the potential abuser, are from 0% to 3.1%. These limits are within current estimates of the prevalence of homosexuality in the general community."
On what basis?
You have an agenda.
Yes. I value the truth.
You will not get away with minimizing the rainbow crowd's participation.
The facts seem to be that they don't have more "participation" than the public in general.
Do you think that you should get away with minimizing the church crowd's "participation"?
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]ActuallyNot[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)