you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Alienhunter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Have we established that there's been an increase in the death rate of young people or not yet as compared to pre-covid?

What I see are a bunch of pieces that cherry pick news of young people dying. Not hard to do since world wide young people die suddenly from unknown causes all the time, although "rare" there's gonna be hundreds every day spread across the entire world out of billions of people. At least.

What I see here and all of them is a "another young person died you know the cause wink wink" thing going on but they won't outright state it was vaccines because they have no evidence for it. They would outright state it if they did. So it stands to reason that they do not.

Since it would be pretty damning evidence if they could establish a higher death rate compared to before COVID, the fact they haven't also suggests that there isn't one (or at least not when other factors like war and economic downturn are considered) or else they'd state it outright to make the case stronger.

This is essentially a way they use to take advantage of the human inability to really grasp statistics. I think it's absolutely reasonable to assume that these vaccines have a higher complication rate than older vaccines, something that will get you crucified in more liberal circles for pointing out, but you'll also get crucified in more conspiratorial circles when you point out a tens of thousands established vaccine deaths among billions vaccinated is a bit like pissing in the ocean and claiming it's polluted.

[–]monkeymagic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

the fact that there is available news at all is the part that jumps out at me. msm controls the narrative. if they are reporting “died suddenly, unknown cause”, they are doing that for a reason.

kinda like how the nfl had damar hamlin carted off via ambulance only to return as the unibomber FOR A REASON!

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The point of labeling it an unknown cause is to hide the fact that there is a huge spike in miocarditis. That stat is a fraction of total deaths so an additional thousand deaths a month of that particular cause will show up as a 300% increase in miocarditis deaths, but it will only be a 3% increase in all cause mortality.

They are lying about not knowing the cause of death. Doctors and coroners are not this stupid. I would like to hear any other reasonable explanation as to why they are lying if it is not to cover up a vaccine injury epidemic.

[–]BanditMcFuklebuck 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Why not the virus itself? Covid is established as a cause of cardiac issues and it's floating around in the air all around us. Why jump to the conclusion that it's an inert protein manufactured by our own bodies thru mRNA and not an actual pathogen?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

an inert protein

The spike protien is anything but inert. It is extremely damaging to our cells. It's function is to poke holes in cells so the virus can get in.

Covid is a respiratory virus. It does not infect every cell in the body the way the mRNA injection can. The spike protiens produced by the virus are not free floating, they are part of the protective membrane of the virus. That makes them easier to clean up for the immine system. There are also far less of them produced in a natural infection.

It is also the fact that the mRNA injection infects other cells that makes the vaccine so harmful. It directly attacks blood vessle cells and heart cells. These do not get infected by covid.