Vaccinated Can Spread mRNA and Spike Protein to Other People

submitted by Gaydolf_Titler from theflstandard.com

all 22 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Alphix 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have experienced the spread of the spike protein from a jabbed firsthand. This is very, very real, at least for the spike. The mRNA requires real intimacy, I am sure.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Shedding the self-produced spike will be harmless. Spreading bodily fluids in small quantities will have 0.0% of the thirty micrograms of jab juice, which will be harmless also. Worry about something more useful.

[–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Also: This is a pharmacist registering her opinion in the journal. This is not a peer-reviewed finding of mRNA shedding LMAO

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Fifty years ago, peer review may have been useful. But for the last few years, peer review has been weaponised as a method to deny publication to studies which might cost the drug cartels money.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Okay yes, but also this is just one person's opinion

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Not one person, and not just an opinion plucked from thin air, its an educated opinion based on facts and observations. Shitty papers and studies like the TOGETHER trial that support the drug cartels pass through peer review despite fatal flaws that invalidate the entire study; outright fraudulent studies by the cartels, like for Vioxx that killed many tens or even hundreds of thousands of Americans, have no trouble passing peer review.

But papers that contradict the cartels get rejected for no good reason, or get stuck in limbo for years waiting for the reviewers to actually review.

Remember that for almost the entire history of science, there was no such thing as peer review and there are no studies that prove that peer review results in better quality science. In fact, the opposite -- peer review makes science worse. See the above link for details.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Any jackenape can throw unrelated word salad together and be believed

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Any jackenape can throw unrelated word salad together and be believed

I believe you!

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They're censoring everything else.

Why do you think evidence of mRNA shedding would make it through peer review gate keeping?

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because I just read a paper on it like today? A published peer-reviewed paper that showed the jabbies were shedding culturable virus for longer than the pureblood.

But it's a small sample so I didn't bother remembering the name or authors LOL the science is changing a LOT faster than the narrative!

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Vaxxists, a year ago: "It is absolutely, categorically impossible for mRNA shedding from the vaccine, that is a mad insane anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory".

Today: "Well okay, so the vaccinated do shed mRNA and spike protein, but it is such a tiny amount that only mad insane anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists will worry about it."

A year from now: "We always told you that the vaccinated would shed large amounts of active mRNA and spike protein that can infect people they interact with. And that's a good thing. I don't know why you mad insane anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists are complaining, we saved you the trouble of going to the doctor to get the jab, you should thank us."

Shedding the self-produced spike will be harmless

The spike protein is a dangerous and toxic substance, which among other issues can cause blood clotting. We don't know what is a safe exposure. The same people who are telling us that the amount shed is "safe" are also telling us that there is no safe amount of the virus spike because it can cause all sorts of harms including "Long Covid" (post-viral syndrome).

Even if it is safe for healthy adults, what about the elderly, and babies, and fetuses? We just don't know. I'm leaning towards thinking that the amount of spike being shed will likely be harmless, but I'd only give 1:2 odds on that.

Shed mRNA is a different story. The spike protein doesn't reproduce. If you are exposed to 1 μg of spike, you are exposed to 1 μg and that's it, your immune system will deal with it, or it won't, but it is limited to the damage that 1 μg can do. But the RNA is different. It you are exposed to 1 μg of RNA, there is no way of knowing how much of that RNA will infect your cells, or which cells, and how much spike protein those cells will produce. Nobody really knows how much spike protein will be made by 1 μg of RNA, but it will probably be different depending on who you are, whether you have already been exposed to Covid, and which cells are infected.

There have been too many nasty surprises and mad insane antivaxxer conspiracy theories that have come true for me to be comfortable just dismissing this. And I sure as hell don't trust reassurances from Pfizer or Moderna or any of their fans and shills.

CC u/Gaydolf_Titler

[–]Gaydolf_Titler[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I sure as hell don't trust reassurances from Pfizer or Moderna or any of their fans and shills.

This is the key here, and it's inscredibly disheartening how many people would not only trust implicitly, but go to bat for these creatures whose modus operandi since the founding of the pharmaceutical field has been to place the importance of profits over safety and effectiveness, with testing of their products done on the unwilling or on those who have no choice but to comply. Many pharmaceutical companies have long histories of undeniably evil actions across the globe, and it's dumbfounding how this isn't recognized nowadays. It certainly is all psychological operations, pharma companies taking pages right out of the Rand Corporation's playbook on psyops, and especially the younger generation is so transfixed on mindless entertainment to care, and those who do actually care face peer pressure from those who do drink the gov't & pharma kool-aid. It's so disheartening, but there does seem to be some glimmers of hope. My big concern is how far will they let this "great awakening" go before it's decided some major, catastrophic even needs to occur to detract attention to it. Maybe roll-out the planned Cyber Polygon worm to disrupt global internet communications...or worse.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The jab juice contains self-replicating nanotech though.

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

self-replicating nanotech

That would be the mRNA, except its not self-replicating, it requires the cellular machinery of human cells to replicate, and even there its been crippled so that it shouldn't replicate itself, only the spike protein.

Because of course re-programming human cells, including heart cells, to produce a toxin that causes blood clots, is a great idea! What could possibly go wrong with training the immune system to attack your own heart and blood vessels?

Of course all this assume no reverse transcription of the RNA into DNA takes place. The good news is, that hardly ever happens.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, that's not what I mean. I mean this: https://naturalnews.com/2021-07-13-people-vaccinated-covid-more-magnetic-over-time.html

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Also, reverse transcription happens a hell of a lot more than it is given credit for. Remember, all enzymes are bidirectional. Not sure if you're being sarcastic by "hardly ever happens"?

[–]weavilsatemyface 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

reverse transcription happens a hell of a lot more than it is given credit for.

Reverse transcription in general is more common than most people think. Reverse transcription of the RNA in Covid vaccines (or the Covid virus for that matter) into human DNA, we have no idea.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

except it always happens LMAO

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There was a major concern that the mRNA would break if it was out of a cold chain for a few minutes. I'm not afraid of a 0.000000x microgram dose of broken mRNA or DNA on my skin. Sorry it's just not reasonable to be worrying here.

[–]1Icemonkey 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These vaxxed pussies need to be made into pariahs. Remember when they did it to us, the unjabbed? Fuck them.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Gaydolf_Titler[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Seems the tables are beginning to turn. As a non-vaxxed person, I am offended by those who have put my health at risk by their ignorance, as much as they have claimed that we, the non-vaxxed, were putting thier health at risk by not taking the jab. Very similar to those who claim they don't care about thier own digital privacy ("If I've done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide, why should I care if I'm being tracked or spied on?"). When you don't care about your own privacy and allow big tech to spy on you, you are allowing them to spy on everyone else you communicate with, whether they consent to it or not. Ignorant fucks.

    [–]adultmanhwa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Unvaxxed pussy/penis = divine, I think 'body count will be limited' & we'll have relatively more healthy nuclear family in near future.