you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (12 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

    Sweden has manipulated that data from the earliest COVID period

    evidence?

    while also arranging for 'scientists' in Sweden to state that they have a better approach to COVID in Sweden, (but without the appriate arguments).

    evidence?

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Do you always consider so many opinion pieces to be evidence?

      https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/21/coronavirus-swedish-herd-immunity-drove-up-death-toll-column/5472100002/

      It even has 'opinion' in the URL 🤣

      [–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

      Which links are about 'Sweden has manipulated that data from the earliest COVID period'? Providing a ton of tangentially related 'evidence' is called a 'gish gallop'.

      [–][deleted]  (7 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

        you have no evidence that 'Sweden has manipulated that data from the earliest COVID period', therefore you are making shit up, like a shill.

        [–][deleted]  (5 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

          imagine spending all day lying because you're upset that lockdowns were the wrong decision.

          [–][deleted]  (3 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

            So are the OECD (5 month old) statistics wrong, or are you anti-science? I had you pegged as a man of science, but I guess the science is contradicting your rigid political worldview.