you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'd like to see the link being made by researchers who's conducting actual research that can be peer-reviewed and replicated.

Good luck to the researcher publishing any evidence of harm from a vaccine advocated by the entire pharmaceutical industry, every government, all media and all universities. It is a career ender to contradict narrative science.

Considering we already have massively skewed data on actual COVID deaths, hyper.inflated due to recording COVID as a cause of death for any person who had tested positive within 28 days of dying regardless of whether it was actually death by drink driving, a complication of stage 4 cancer or a gunshot wound to the face. If we cannot trust data that uses deaths with COVID as deaths of COVID, how can we now trust data that suggests the vaccines cause zero deaths? There is no way that there will be open and honest discussion about the repercussions of vaccine side effects and fatalities.

[–]Tronski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I seem to clearly remember blood clots from AstraZeneca being a huge thing that lead to it being pulled. What makes you say they'll be forever dishonest about the effect when they were clearly open and honest about consequences after only a few weeks?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

AZ is still approved for use by the EU. They issued it in the UK for the first 3 doses for people. Clearly they knew and didn't give a shit. Still not convinced me to trust them.

[–]Tronski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is that not because they made changes and got reapproved?