'She was fine, and then her heart stopped': Illinois Rep. Sean Casten reveals healthy daughter, 17, died from rare cardiac arrhythmia in her sleep in June - family has been left 'grasping at the wrong end of a random chance' (She was vaccinated)

submitted by [deleted] from dailymail.co.uk

all 37 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]chickenz 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (27 children)

She was vaccinated, so she died safe.

Go Brandon

[–]CreditKnifeMan 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

She was vaccinated, so she died safe.

This would make a great billboard statement.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]CreditKnifeMan 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

    *safely (if the billboard is in an English speaking country)

    "Safely" is an adverb, which as is a grammatic catch-all category.

    She was vaccinated, so she died safe.

    "Safe" is grammatically correct.

    "Died safe" is an inherent contradiction.

    "Died safe" is irrefutable fraud.

    Replace every "died suddenly" headline with "died safely".

    "Died safe" is a two syllable red pill.

    A masterpiece.

    Edit: /s/asshole the bedrock assumption of every safety study is and adverse event is/was caused by the medication/device; until proven otherwise.

    Unfortunately, the opposite is the case with these injections.

    Inexplicably, it is assumed that the injections are not the cause of anything

    Doctors are "baffled"...

    Baffels are features added to the inside of a muffler to suppress sound.
    Baffles are features in a suppressors and silencers.

    Doctors are baffled...
    Confused.
    Suppressed.
    Silenced.

    [–]chickenz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    If you look at the homepage of http://techarp.com you will see a bunch of bullshit stories and then about four stories that debunk claims that someone died from a vax.

    https://www.techarp.com/facts/sara-lee-vaccine-sudden-death/?amp=1

    https://www.techarp.com/facts/kim-jung-gi-heart-attack-sads/?amp=1

    https://www.techarp.com/facts/loretta-lynn-die-not-vaccine-sads/?amp=1

    https://www.techarp.com/facts/coolio-death-vaccine-sads/?amp=1

    https://www.techarp.com/facts/paul-ryder-cause-of-death/?amp=1

    [–][deleted]  (21 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]chickenz 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

      My ex-wife was healthy, but after she got vaxxed she can barely see and can barely walk.

      fuck fauci and fuck Biden and fuck you

      [–][deleted]  (16 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]chickenz 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

        she was healthy until she got vaxxed.

        she is dying because of the poison vax.

        [–][deleted]  (14 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]chickenz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

          fkn trannies won't shut the fuck up

          [–][deleted]  (12 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]chickenz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

            my ex was very healthy until she got vaxxed

            [–][deleted]  (10 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]ID10T 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              The only benefit from sharing the risks of covid vacs is preventing sickness and death. Who benefits from promoting vaccines? Oh yeah billions of dollars to pharma companies, who have consistently proven that they will put profits above lives every time.

              Why do you think they aren't giving covid vaccines to children in the UK any more? Because the risk of adverse vaccine effects is greater than the risk of covid effects.

              https://firstfactcheck.substack.com/p/claim-deaths-of-all-causes-increasing

              https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamacardiology/fullarticle/2791253

              Studies show that mRNA vaccines cause reduced immune response over time and boosters should be discontinued:

              https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35659687/

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                I guess you don't believe in science. You argue from propaganda taking points. You fail to change your opinion based on new evidence. It's a bad look my man.

                [–]RedEyedWarrior 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                Even if the vaccine has had no affect on her death and she would have died anyway, I still do not want anybody forced to get vaccines, regardless if those vaccines are real or fake.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                Daddy can't loose his job over this. He literally represents all the hipocrisy US has to offer.

                It is called nudging.

                What are your options? When all yoy can do for a living is hiding behind a tie and talking bs?

                [–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

                Daddy probably blackmailed her into getting the jab. Threatened to leave her out of the will, kick her out of the house; or refuse to pay for her college. Maybe he held her down while the 'vaccine' was inserted into her. I don't know the details, but it wouldn't surprise me if he did any of that. What I do know is that most politicians are so stupid and sociopathic that they don't even give a rat's arse about the wellbeing of their children. They only reproduce because they think having kids will help them get elected.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                This is the direction I was pointing.

                [–]RedEyedWarrior 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                Yep. Politicians are the worst kinds of parents, let alone the worst kinds of people.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                Three of my cousins are gay men.

                So we're putting something in the pot here.

                Look at them... i mean look at them... These people! I still can't get all this ignorance...

                When reality is literally screaming everyday into people's faces.

                Fyi: I bond hard anyhow. To women as well as to men. But the ability to actually comprehend seems to be correlated to homosexuality.

                Fyi: I wouldn't state this, if it was the first "coincidence" with this flavor in my life.

                [–]RedEyedWarrior 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

                If you're saying that your gay cousins are dumb, I'm not surprised. I'm a gay man and I cam tell you clearly that a lot of gay people are retarded. Probably most of them are. I guess if an evil person helped win you the right to marry, you'd swear that this evil person was good. But still, read between the lines and think outside the box. Since when have politicians done anything out of the goodness of their own hearts?

                For the record, I have yet to met a gay man with a triple digit IQ. I don't count myself - I don't know my own IQ, but I presume it's somewhere around the 80s or 90s.

                [–]Tronski 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

                I'd also like to offer some evidence people died of conditions like these before 2020:

                https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/sudden-unexplained-death-in-childhood/

                https://www.bhf.org.uk/informationsupport/conditions/sads

                https://academic.oup.com/eurjpc/article/13/6/859/5932831

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307931/#!po=4.12844

                Correlation is not causation. Vaccines is most likely not a factor here.

                [–]chickenz 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                tronski is a promoter of vaccines.

                fuck you.

                [–]Tronski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                Woah there, remember earlier, when I said people died of AstraZeneca vaccines in your thread?

                The only thing I promote is facts and science with sources.

                [–]chickenz 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                go fuck you fruitcup..

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

                I don't think anyone was suggesting that this wasn't a known type of death in young people.

                Without knowing the prior health of the girl or the affect that the vaccine had on her health, statistical likelihood is irrelevant conjecture.

                Let's not pretend that J&J's COVID vaccine didn't get pulled for risk of blood clots or that other brands of vaccine are not related to myocarditis. Either of these could have contributed to pre-existing conditions that led to her death, or it might not be a factor at all.

                [–]Tronski 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

                My assumption might have been wrong, but 10 out of 10 times I've seen these kinds of posts someone is trying to link (covid) vaccines to a new kind of unexplained death / heart failure that has never been seen before 2020.

                And if nothing else, you can see the first anti-vaxxer going at my comment within minutes, lol. The information doesn't hurt.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                It is fair to evidence the existence of the condition prior to COVID, and it is fair that the 'anti-vaxxers' as you call them have their view too. There's nothing wrong with people linking conditions to a new type of medical intervention with no long term studies and limited study groups. It's important that people are able to share their concerns after they were silenced by social media for doing this at the beginning of the 'pandemic'.

                Your post ended with an assumption that can easily be opposed with an equal and opposite assumption. The article even highlights that COVID itself can increase likelihood of such a death, is it so far fetched that the vaccine can cause it too? We are bombarded with pro-vaccine propaganda, and have been for a couple of years now, to put anyone down for raising concerns of vaccines having an increased risk of similar conditions is just joining in with the media propaganda.

                [–]Tronski 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

                I don't disagree with you that it's legit to put it out there, but I'd like to see the link being made by researchers who's conducting actual research that can be peer-reviewed and replicated.

                But on the other hand, when the death are difficult to explain to begin with, how would you differentiate between those that died as a result of getting the vaccine and those who would have died anyway?

                Considering how many have gotten the vaccine, unless the unvaccinated cases from 2022 are equal or larger than the total from 2019, it would be almost impossible to link a single death to vaccines

                It's a recipe for confirmation basis: "0% of SADS had the covid vaccine in 2019, 5% more total cases in 2022 and 75% of the dead were vaccinated. Yup, vaccines cause more SADS."

                As a comment about other media, I don't know about Reddit, but Twitter does not remove content trying to link SADS to covid vaccines. That's where I've had most of the discussions.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                I'd like to see the link being made by researchers who's conducting actual research that can be peer-reviewed and replicated.

                Good luck to the researcher publishing any evidence of harm from a vaccine advocated by the entire pharmaceutical industry, every government, all media and all universities. It is a career ender to contradict narrative science.

                Considering we already have massively skewed data on actual COVID deaths, hyper.inflated due to recording COVID as a cause of death for any person who had tested positive within 28 days of dying regardless of whether it was actually death by drink driving, a complication of stage 4 cancer or a gunshot wound to the face. If we cannot trust data that uses deaths with COVID as deaths of COVID, how can we now trust data that suggests the vaccines cause zero deaths? There is no way that there will be open and honest discussion about the repercussions of vaccine side effects and fatalities.

                [–]tiny-brown-mug 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                There's some stuff on the NIH website.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446734/

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35042731/

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36087300/

                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34222134/

                Sadly, some studies basically admit that the injections are potentially dangerous for some people, but still push them as "safe and effective overall", and recommend them. The pressure on the medical industry, doctors, and researches to just shut up and go along with the program must be immense.

                You can also use the search bar on the NIH website to hunt for articles.

                [–]Tronski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                I seem to clearly remember blood clots from AstraZeneca being a huge thing that lead to it being pulled. What makes you say they'll be forever dishonest about the effect when they were clearly open and honest about consequences after only a few weeks?

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                AZ is still approved for use by the EU. They issued it in the UK for the first 3 doses for people. Clearly they knew and didn't give a shit. Still not convinced me to trust them.

                [–]Tronski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Is that not because they made changes and got reapproved?

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                That is exactly the problem.

                They force-fed the public with these jabs without sharing any serious knowledge beforehand.

                Even if somebody now can collect enough data to prove a strong correlation between premature death and a jab, these asshats still got plausible deniability. For filling their mishpoke's pockets in BigPharma.

                I hope someday somebody has balls enough to leak what they knew beforehand. Especially for their cashcows.

                It is proven many times that holding back data is their standard modus operandi.

                If i'd had a say in this, i'd seize all Pfizer (e.g.) assets till they share all their data. This is legit because they burned mostly tax-money for their research.