you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Bridgeheadprod 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Their side said something bad. They am all bad.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

But they're the ones who preach tolerance and open-mindedness all the time. And yet, here they are in direct violation of those creeds.

The reason is because if you're doing this against The Other, it's A-OK according to their ethics. Here's a good piece that lays it out. After you read it, you'll understand why they do these disgusting things and never suffer any cognitive dissonance.

The keywords Martha's Vineyard must have triggered the social media company's dashboard and posters have been dispatched here to defend the elites against criticism.

[–]Bridgeheadprod 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I’m probably more on the side of the Desantis’ of the world. I just think it’s worth reflecting on the way they have us so opposed to each other. All it takes is one asshole on either side to do or say anything, and we boil down entire populations who share some of the ideologies, lump them all together, and claim they are the baddies. It goes both ways. It’s done to both sides and by both sides, as much as anyone can claim that an individual represent an entire ideology.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

This is bothsidesism.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Is this a thing or did you make it up 🤔

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Nope, it's real. For example, thinking that there are two equal sides to the Hunter Biden laptop story. There aren't. The laptop is real, the emails are real, and the censorship of the story was a crime.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I appreciate the context 👍 kudos brother Chip

[–]Bridgeheadprod 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Nah man. In the case of hunter it’s the crimes of one man. In this case it’s an individual in a group saying something, and the whole group being painted in the same light. Apples and oranges.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

MORE defense of the wealthy and powerful? How many paid posters are on this site, anyway?

[–]Bridgeheadprod 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not paid, and just pointing out the overall flawed philosophy of attributing the comments of one to an entire group. Change starts from within my friend

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Really? Then why defend the wealthy and powerful for free? Who does that?

They don't want you on their side. They despise you. If they want people to defend them online, they'll hire them. Don't work for free. That's being a sucker.