The Martha's Vineyard residents who deported 50 migrants last week are now making jokes about how people are going to die in the upcoming Florida hurricane, calling it Karma. These are the people who believe they're the good guys.

submitted by Chipit from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Private home owners have no obligation to accommodate non-citizens regardless of their status or needs.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Oh, who said that? Stop inventing things I didn't say.

I said considering their pro-migrant beliefs, they should voluntarily open their homes to these people, like the people of Texas did to Hurricane Katrina refugees. They have plenty of space, plenty of money, and they tell us how kind and tolerant they are all the time. It's just weird they immediately deported them, considering these conditions.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hypocrisy always has a bittersweet outcome, no? They solve their problems by exposing their true intolerance. But the safest place for both the refugees and the residents is to house them securely.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Right, which is why Martha's Vineyard is the natural home for these migrants. The residents love migrants, and the migrants will benefit from them sharing their vast wealth.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree. 🤌

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oh ok so housing the trafficked refugees in a national guard barracks was the CORRECT outcome?

Instead of government forcing property owners to open up their apartments?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Housing political refugees is the job of a government, not a citizen. So yes, a barracks is probably a sensible option. Besides, it's suitable residence for a soldier, why not a refugee?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, makes sense to me, but the dipshit OP disagrees, he seems to think that if the residents didn't open their specific home at that time, then the trafficked refugees should have been left sleeping on the street. He actually thinks it's pretty damning that the refugees were placed in a barracks but he didn't explain why he thought that so 🤷