you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Hahaha it's really funny

See first of all someone did a hilarious human trafficking of accepted and processed refugee women and children to an Atlantic island.

Then the residents of that island stood up and housed, clothed and fed the refugees.

But now we've found a possibly tangentially related (possibly totally unrelated) person who made a facebook post in bad taste! BOOM so funny that they thought they were the good guys for feeding and clothing refugees but LITTLE DID THEY KNOW we'd be finding an internet post in bad taste! Take that dems! Score one for the far-right who never ever post bad taste social media!

[–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (16 children)

WTF? No they didn't. They immediately deported them within 24 hours.

Despite the fact that Martha's Vineyard is bursting at the seams with unoccupied housing that could easily have accommodated them all, and thousands more besides. Good job siding with the powerful and against the little guy, though. It's only about the 1000th time this account has done it.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

WTF? No they didn't

You're wrong

https://www.capecodtimes.com/story/news/2022/09/15/marthas-vineyard-shelter-organizations-helping-migrants-donations-needed/10385536002/

https://www.masslive.com/capecod/2022/09/migrants-sent-to-marthas-vineyard-from-florida-sheltered-fed-as-local-officials-scramble-for-a-plan.html

https://www.axios.com/2022/09/15/migrants-marthas-vineyard-immigration

They immediately deported them within 24 hours.

You can't deport a refugee dipshit. Show any proof

Good job siding with the powerful and against the little guy, though.

Yeah I side with powerful refugee women and children against the weak little guy who governs Florida, that's true

this account has done it.

This person. I am a person, there are not multiple people running my account and I can prove it with a video call with whoever wishes to speak with me

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

They deported them straight out of Martha's Vineyard into a military base.

Obviously they don't want such filthy poor people around them.

Stop supporting the narratives that the powerful are promoting. Instead, side with us.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Ok so just to be clear - you ARE in favour of suspending private property rights to accommodate refugees?

Despite the fact that Martha's Vineyard is bursting at the seams with unoccupied housing

Let's just make sure everyone is very clear that chipit believes people's houses should be requisitioned by the government to give to refugees. That's chipits position and he's a consistent guy so you won't find him arguing in favour of property rights or the 3rd amendment anywhere else.

They deported them straight out of Martha's Vineyard into a military base.

Ah you wrote 'deported' but because of your retardation you actually meant something else entirely.

Let's just check again to make sure we all understand chipits highly consistent position here.

Using a publicly owned barracks to shelter refugees who have been trafficked <- that's bad

Government requisitioning people's property <- that's good

That's what chipit believes. Just so we're clear

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

This entire post is putting words in my mouth. It is entirely the imagination of the poster.

Martha's Vineyard residents should have opened their hearts to these migrants and housed them in their own homes. They can easily afford it, and the homes are empty this time of year. You know, like the people of Texas did after Hurricane Katrina.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Private home owners have no obligation to accommodate non-citizens regardless of their status or needs.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Oh, who said that? Stop inventing things I didn't say.

I said considering their pro-migrant beliefs, they should voluntarily open their homes to these people, like the people of Texas did to Hurricane Katrina refugees. They have plenty of space, plenty of money, and they tell us how kind and tolerant they are all the time. It's just weird they immediately deported them, considering these conditions.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hypocrisy always has a bittersweet outcome, no? They solve their problems by exposing their true intolerance. But the safest place for both the refugees and the residents is to house them securely.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Right, which is why Martha's Vineyard is the natural home for these migrants. The residents love migrants, and the migrants will benefit from them sharing their vast wealth.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Oh ok so housing the trafficked refugees in a national guard barracks was the CORRECT outcome?

Instead of government forcing property owners to open up their apartments?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Housing political refugees is the job of a government, not a citizen. So yes, a barracks is probably a sensible option. Besides, it's suitable residence for a soldier, why not a refugee?

[–]Site_rly_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, makes sense to me, but the dipshit OP disagrees, he seems to think that if the residents didn't open their specific home at that time, then the trafficked refugees should have been left sleeping on the street. He actually thinks it's pretty damning that the refugees were placed in a barracks but he didn't explain why he thought that so 🤷

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Martha's Vineyard residents should have opened their hearts to these migrants and housed them in their own homes. They can easily afford it, and the homes are empty this time of year. You know, like the people of Texas did after Hurricane Katrina.

[–]Site_rly_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Martha's Vineyard residents should have opened their hearts

The links are evidence that they did

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They deported the immigrants immediately.