Schools not obligated to use pupils' preferred pronouns, attorney general says

submitted by HiddenFox from (news.sky.com)

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]iamonlyoneman 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For the lazy: Attorney General Suella Braverman, of England and Wales.

[–]ephrem_moseley 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent

[–]LearningTheLand 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good.

[–]Lord_Falklands 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

well about time

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mermaids say ignore the law.

https://mermaidsuk.org.uk/news/trans-rights-in-schools-mermaids-statement/

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]HeyBobby 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Maybe within a small group of existing pronouns like he/her/they, but no way will I ever refer to someone as xer/zer/zim or any sort of -kin pronoun.

    [–]zpgnbg 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Finally, some sense.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Wait, what? No! My preferred pronoun is "YOUR HOLY IMPERIAL MAJESTY" and includes prosternation.

    Well that's it. I'm never going into a US school ever again. That'll teach'em.