Teacher had sex with boy, 13, in classroom and even moved into his apartment complex

submitted by [deleted] from dailystar.co.uk

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (32 children)

"Teacher raped boy, 13, in classroom and even moved into his apartment complex"

FTFY

[–]raven9 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

All you do by calling consensual sex rape is to weaken the significance of rape. There is not a 13yr old high school kid on the planet that wouldn't do their hot teacher if they could and no adult male would deny that.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

This is an actual "OK, Groomer" moment.

Incredible.

Please stay away from children.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (13 children)

This is an actual "OK, Groomer" moment.

How do you figure? He said most boys would happily be groomed, not that HE wanted to fuck anyone underage, I can confirm I would have happily used my 30 year old teacher as a fleshlight when I was that age, and I would not have been a 'victim' of any sort. You are confusing being 'groomed' with being a 'groomer'.

[–]HanssenBob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Why can't that apply to girls too then?

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Because foids are supposed to always be innocent and it's always a man's fault. Even if the foid is in her forties or fifties.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Children can't consent.

Only a groomer would imply that they can.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Children can't consent.

Only a groomer would imply that they can.

Its clearly not that simple. Are you telling me that at 17 years and 364 days old I am incapable of consenting to sex, but overnight I have a magical rapid brain development, and the next day I am capable of consenting? This is what the law says - sort of - the age of consent, or what constitutes an adult is different in a hell of a lot of states. There is clearly some ambiguity about when precisely an individual is emotionally capable of consenting to sex

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

OK, Groomer.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So, you aren't actually able to refute or address anything I said, and are resorting to ad hominem attacks and name calling, got it, good talk.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You moved the goalposts with whataboutism and now you want to cry about ad hominems? Fuck off.

A 32-year-old woman took advantage of a 13-year-old boy. Attempting to downplay that is some pedo-groomer bullshit.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You moved the goalposts with whataboutism and now you want to cry about ad hominems? Fuck off.

Whataboutism, a valid example proving something wrong, but dismissed as invalid based on the fact that they cannot refute it

[–]Cass 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Children are capable of consenting to sex with adults when they're capable of doing all the other things adults are doing.

... that's what I wanted to say. Then I remembered child labor is on its way to becoming legal again in the US so you'll soon see 13 yos paying taxes. And you know what? If you're 13, you have a job and you pay taxes, you can also bang a 30 yo why not

[–]Insider 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a social concept. A thousand years ago, post-puberty kids were banging like no tomorrow. Life expectancy was 20-35 years.

Age consent laws are good for protecting kids from predators, but if an 18 year old and 16 year old want to bang each other, it shouldn't be a big deal.

Ideally, post-puberty young adults who are level-headed, mentally mature, are aware of predators and can make decisions for themselves should be allowed to make their own sexual decisions. However, there's just no way to judge and implement a rule for that. People who mature slower, even past the age of 18 can also be taken advantage of, manipulated and groomed. Just ask Drake, he's got lots of experience.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, here in Québec it's 14 years old. The second largest city in Canada, Montréal, is less than an hour's drive from Plattsburgh, New York. So a 15-year-old can't have sex with an adult in Plattsburgh, but they drive North 50 miles and it's no problem.

My point is, LEGAL consent isn't the same thing as biological consent. There is such a thing. Imagine you are 13 and your fat, ugly, stinking teacher comes to try to seduce you. You squirm in anguish. She rubs her huge, sagging and flabby chest on you and you can feel her hand cupping you through your pants. Her revolting breath in your face. Question: ARE YOU HARD? Answer: probably not. But if you are, chances are you want to do her. Biological consent through erection. Same thing with an "underage" (the concept varies hugely from place to place as demonstrated above) girl: If she starts ripping her clothes off and her pussy is dripping wet, it's biological consent.

It's still completely illegal (unless they drive to a place where it isn't) but is it wrong? I think the question is worth asking. I feel it's debatable. No LEGAL consent is being given, yet biological consent is there...

[–]HPFL 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

A racist AND a ped0? Wow, there is scum and then there is SCUM.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Wanting to do vs. it being a good idea are two different things.

I was once (long ago) a horny 13-year-old kid becoming aware of his same-sex attraction, and would certainly have jumped at the chance to have sex with a real live adult male. Do you think that would have been a good idea? I'm willing to bet your answer would be no. Just to clarify my own opinion: no, that would not have been a good idea in any way.

Adults should not be having sex with children. Full stop, whether heterosexual or homosexual, whether the child in question seems to want that sex or not.

[–]Cass 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Were you attracted to adult males? I remember when I was a teenager anyone between 20 to 60 looked the same to me.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At the time, 20-25 would have been "adult" and potentially hot. Over, say, 30 would have been gross. I can't remember now since my perspective has been distorted by age (spouse and I are now in our 50s and still find each other attractive).

[–]Zapped 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Would you give drugs to a 13 year-old if they want to get high?

[–]HPFL 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

What if the child had mental and/or physical health problems that could only be treated with psychedelics and cannabis because conventional medicine failed?

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Would you give drugs to a 13 year-old if they want to get high, that are not needed for any medical reason?

[–]HPFL 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I was forced to take antidepressants at 11 or be expelled from school. Fuck your reefer madness shit.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What does that have to do with anything here?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Jewish psychiatry at its best. Deal.

[–]HPFL 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Christian deflection and projection at its worst.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nothing Christian about this, a muslim, buddhist or Hindu might have said the same thing.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I wouldn't have and I still wouldn't.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Sorry but no. Just NO. First and foremost, if said boy gets hard, he wants it. If he wants it, it's not rape. Yes, he's too young for "legal consent". But he gave literal biological consent, and biology doesn't lie. The kid enjoyed himself, no doubt about it. I'd have done her in an instant given the opportunity back when I was 13.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

OK, Groomer.