you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (10 children)

[deleted]

    [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

    You just skipped my questions and went straight to, “because they said so.”

    [–][deleted]  (8 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      You’ve witnessed “thousands of scientists” saying something? When? Where?

      Was it a public back-and-forth where the scientists (like Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Ryan Cole, Simone Gold, etc.) representing the opposing arguments were included? What exactly were their most compelling arguments, and how were they disproven?

      Personally, I’ve never seen any public conversation/debate on the issue. How does “informed consent” work without knowing all sides?

      [–][deleted]  (6 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

        If you don’t know their argument, then how can you say they have “no argument” and how can informed consent to be given?

        [–][deleted]  (4 children)

        [deleted]

          [–]curious2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

          Were award-winning, peer-reviewed cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr Royceberg’s opposing assessments also deemed “poorly argued?”

          [–][deleted]  (2 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]curious2 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            Me:

            Were award-winning, peer-reviewed cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr Royceberg’s opposing assessments also deemed “poorly argued?”

            Dingleberry:

            yes

            That’s interesting. Because I completely made up that name out of thin air. LMAO! Fraud.