Globohomo wins in court: Slovenia Legalizes Gay Marriage Despite Population Voting Against it Three Times

submitted by iamonlyoneman from summit.news

all 26 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Rob3122 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The forced faggotry upon the planet continues

[–]weavilsatemyface 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If you don't want to be a faggot, nobody is "forcing" you to be one. Find something more important to worry about than what people do in the privacy of their own bedroom.

[–]Gaslov 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If they kept to themselves there wouldn't be a problem.

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not the one who needs a parade and an entire month to celebrate what I do in the bedroom. It's getting more difficult to watch a tv show or movie that doesn't include gay shit. Then you have the tranny freak faggots who want to read perverted books to children in Hope's of finding their next victim. The fucking president has several fags(tranny freaks) in his administration and one who is an obese male who wears a dress and calls himself Rachel...is in charge the country's health.

But yeah, nobody is forcing the faggotry.../s

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There was a pay out I'll bet, or threats by ZOGBTQ

[–]TarBaby 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

They want to turn the entire planet gay or trans or lesbian or at least bi. Effeminate men and Butch women.

[–]weavilsatemyface 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Don't fuckin group those trans mental cases in with perfectly normal LGB folks.

Number of people being forced to be gay: zero.

Number of people having hormone blockers to turn them gay: zero.

Number of people having surgery to turn them gay: zero.

Number of gay and lesbian kids being converted into distorted, freakish "transgenders" who will require tens of thousands of dollars in medical expenses for the rest of their life: hundreds of thousands.

Being queer or bi is perfectly normal for a minority of people. Love is love, why should we tell them who they can and can't love?

Being trans is mental illness, and that has been monetised by the medical industry that doesn't care what harm they do, so long as they can get those expensive fees for hormones, puberty blockers and surgery.

[–]TarBaby 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It is all a conspiracy by the progressives to turn kids, transgender.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Wrong. It's to get access to fuckable children. This is only a step in the progressive direction.

[–]TarBaby 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They teach the children what to think instead of how to think.

[–]Rob3122 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is nothing normal about faggotry.

[–]weavilsatemyface 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If ignorant bigots voted against people called "John" marrying people called "Sue", the courts would block it too. What business of yours is it who people marry?

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the same retarded logic that wants females to be able to murder innocent babies. Just becaues it doesn't happen in my living room doesn't make it not a problem for my society.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I’m in favour of gay marriage, but I do not support court rulings legalising it. On what basis did the court say that gay marriage should be legal? Unless the constitution specifically says that marriage cannot be denied to same sex couples, it should be up to parliament to decide. This can set a dangerous precedent, like courts making up laws or repealing laws at their own discretion just because they used mental gymnastics to interpret a law a certain way.

The purpose of the courts is to strike down laws that violate the constitution. Not invent laws. And considering that Slovenia has had a civil partnership law since 2017 that gave same sex couples all of the rights of marriage except for joint adoption and IVF, there was no dire need for gay marriage in Slovenia. In fact, you wouldn’t need marriage at all if there were no bachelors' taxes, no inheritance taxes, and if power of attorney documents and wills were recognised and enforced.

You must remember that Slovenia is subservient to the Global American Empire.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It's a good point that allowing courts to craft legislation sets a dangerous precedent, eroding checks and balances.

However, in general I think gay marriage is a good thing. Marriage is a stabilizing force. Those of us who will inevitably be attracted to the same sex need incentives to lead stable lives with commitments to other people.

I realize that many gay men who are in same-sex marriages are still non-monogamous and thus still open to the degeneracy to which gay men are often vulnerable. It still is a net benefit to society to make them at least financially responsible to each other.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Marriage, yes. Marriage is a man and a woman for life. Gays can't marry and their marriages do worse, which is actually destabilizing.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, I see you are a flaming moron. Carry on.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I support gay marriage too. But there has to be a separation of powers between the judicial, legislative and executive branches of the government. If judges can make laws on a whim, then what is the point in having a parliament at all?

Slovenia did hold a referendum on gay marriage back in 2015. They passed the bill, opponents gathered signatures to force a referendum on it, and voters rejected it. What should have happened was the parliament holding a 6-month public consultation on same sex marriage before approving the bill. It would have taken much longer, but at least it would have reduced the chances of voters rejecting the bill in a referendum. Maybe joint adoption and IVF access would have had to be omitted from the gay marriage bill like in Portugal or Belgium, but those two issues were the main reasons why the public voted against gay marriage in Slovenia. They were sceptical of gay couples raising children. I think gay couples who have been vetted adopting orphans is a good thing, but most people in Slovenia did not agree back in 2015.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm with you on separation of powers.

I'm OK with Civil Unions that offer the standard power-of-attorney and inheritance benefits without necessarily adoption rights.

All other things being equal, I think opposite-sex parents are better than same-sex parents, while recognizing that things aren't ever equal and sometimes the best option available to a particular child is a same-sex-parent household. I am opposed to surrogate motherhood (whether or not the couple requesting the surrogate is same or opposite sex) as it is exploitive and potentially financially coercive.

But despite the repeated autistic talking points of morons who can't acknowledge the nuances of difficult social issues, it is still better to have adults financially responsible to each other than it is to wash your hands of a whole class of people and let them fuck themselves mindlessly into oblivion.

[–]RedEyedWarrior 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All good points. I’m on two minds in relation to the marriage debate: 1) civil marriage for both opposite sex couples and same sex couples, and 2) no civil marriage at all, with marriage an exclusively religious institution and civil unions for opposite sex and same sex couples who cannot marry in the church or the mosque.

Adoption should be a case by case basis. Opposite sex couples are generally better than same sex couples when it comes to raising children, but that’s mostly because most straight parents are raising their biological children. Nothing can beat being raised by your birth parents, unless they are dead or are supremely fucked up. But when it comes to adoption or guardianship, I’d say same sex couples are just as good as opposite sex couples in general, but it depends on the couple, the child and the environment.

Surrogacy should be banned for all couples and individuals. A child needs his birth mother for the first six months of his life. Surrogacy deprives the child of that. I hope more countries make it illegal.

[–]weavilsatemyface 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Globohomo

Tell me you're desperately trying to deny that you're gagging for cock without telling me you're desperately trying to deny that you're gagging for cock.

Don't worry iamonlyoneman, we don't judge you for who you love.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Only one of us is thinking of gagging for cock here. I wonder if you have a mirror.

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Only one of us is thinking of gagging for cock here.

Exactly. It's the one trying so fucking hard to prove to everyone just how much he isn't gay.

You're trying too hard. Everyone can see right through it.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

everyone who is gay and wants to have gay sex can imagine they see through it LOL

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My wife and I both think it is hilarious that you actually thought you were insulting me by implying I am gay.

Also pitiful. But mostly hilarious.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wait, were you trying to insult someone by thinking gay thoughts? What?