all 4 comments

[–]IMissPorn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fucking "trafficking" again. That term is worse than useless. With that out of the way, apparently what the nonsense word means today is forcing a little girl to perform sex acts on adult male customers in the store. That's what he claimed happened. This is stupid and unbelievable on the face of it and didn't even warrant investigation in my opinion.

[–]SoCo[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Apparently the candidate and another employee made the report to police. The other employee was not arrested.

Harford County Sheriff Jeffrey R. Gahler said, “It is shameful that a candidate for public office would make up such a story and use it to further his own political agenda."

The Sheriff also disparaged a Sheriff candidate (seems for a different county, instead of a political opponent) for supporting investigation of the accusation.

Repercussions for reporting crime are a scared determent....

[–]Electronic_Antelope 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

claimed on Friday that a man in an adult bookstore was forcing a girl between the ages of 10 and 12 to participate in sex acts with male customers.

The investigation revealed at no time were any sex acts performed or offered by any of the individuals in the establishment as reported by White.”

Seems pretty clear-cut.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why was the under aged child allowed in the adult porn shop?

Why did the videos from the security cameras not support his claims?

A clerk, working at a porn shop of all places, has no chance of winning a republican ticket. It is very likely that he did this to manufacture some notoriety.