you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are making a strawman argument. He did not say that.

The argument is that they are attacking the wrong people. This is clearly intended to start conversations about why they might be doing that, what the results are, why others don't call them out for this.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Radical climate activists" are letting the air out of tires. Global warming is a hoax. Amoral action.

Then he says:

If they'd deflate the tires of the private jets of all those "green" climate activists like Kerry or DeCaprio, I "might" start taking them seriously.

Do you believe Chipit will start believing in global warming, because idiots deflate the tires of "climate activist"?

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

"Taking them seriously" does not mean "believing in global warming". You are making a huge leap in logic there.

What it means is not writing them off immediately as liars, morons, or paid agitators.

If honest and intelligent people want to make a global warming claim we should all hear them out, regardless of our own belief about it.

If violent extremists throw a tantrum there is no reason to entertain anything they say.

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem to know quite a bit about what Chipit is thinking.

The thought terminating cliche concept may not be recognized by people who don't want to see it.

Most people don't notice propaganda that they agree with.