Sgt. of Arms who died suddenly before being able to testify before Jan. 6 kangaroo court admitted all of the 'agitation was done by paid agitators'

submitted by Chipit from (newsweek.com)

all 36 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Site_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (26 children)

No he didn't. He said

investigations should have looked into the role of "what appears to be professional agitators" present during the riot.

Wow who would have thought the 70 year old trump fan who refused to call out the national guard - would have said they APPEAR to be professional. Why didn't he call the guard to deal with these people who look professional? Would have been the smart dutiful thing to do no? The guy's a trumpist boomer, fortunately we don't have to worry about him any more .

I wonder whether the people who bought tactical gear and handcuffs were the ones he thought looked professional. I wonder whether the Oath Keepers who formed tactical ranks and walked lockstep were the ones he thought looked professional. I wonder whether the guys with pipe bombs and precached arms stashes were the ones he thought looked professional. Guess it will all come out anyway so it doesn't matter now

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

And yet he suddenly died days before he was due to testify. I guess we'll never know! Best not to investigate, we might find the thing was as staged as a Broadway production of Lion King.

[–]Site_sux 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

He was 71 and had cancer.

Feel free to try and change the subject some more but you incorrectly wrote "all of the agitation was done by paid agitators" which you made up and staged like a Broadway production. You're the set dresser here, buddy.

So why do YOU think he didn't call out the national guard on these "professional agitators"

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Here's a clue: whenever anyone has damaging testimony to reveal, and suddenly dies, it's not a coincidence. Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.

[–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

He was 71 and had cancer. Keep your dumb "clue"

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Face it, it was murder, or a vaccine death, in the basement with a lead pipe.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Epstein didn't kill himself

[–]dingoatemytaco 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I guess we'll never know!

Many of those 'professionals' were the MAGAtards, for reasons noted by Site_sux. Moreover, if there were non-MAGAtards present, that 70-year-old man was not the only person to see them. So, we know that there weren't any professional agitators.

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Nah, they were paid crisis actors. You think they let things like this happen on their own? LOL.

[–]dingoatemytaco 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No evidence, Chipit.

Saidit shouldn't be MakeShitUpIt.net

[–]dingoatemytaco 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent points. (Unusual to see excellent comments like this on Saidit.)

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

You have to be a paid shill to claim that there were no agitators there. No one is that stupid.

[–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

Sure, lots of proud boys and oath keepers were there to agitate and stir trouble

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

If it turns out there were spooks there instigating do you think they should hang for treason?

[–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Oh you mean like how Enrique tarrio was an FBI informant? You mean like that?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Informants and agents are two very different thing. But you know that quite well, don't you spook?

[–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Would a spook point this out to you? During this week's Jan 6th committee meeting, which you can watch on youtube, they played audio from plain clothes police who were embedded within the crowd. Here's what they were radioing back: precisely which gravy seals had weapons, where they were standing, and what they were wearing. You can go and listen to it. In open committee. Nobody is hiding this from you, you big baby.

What's totally different is to suggest that all of the many hundreds of sweaty pasty old maga men and women who trespassed and beat cops were all feds. You're the crazy one if you think that. The violence was 100% committed by fat magachuds and q-addled morons like Ashley Babbitt. And you had the gall to me stupid

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It's not trespassing if they were allowed to come in by the security, and there is video of exactly that happening. Barriers were moved and doors opened by people working there.

They were also told to go in by undercover feds.

The government has no legal basis to hold anyone for trespassing or insurrection, or any other trumped up charge along those lines. What they are doing is a human rights violation.

[–]Site_sux 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You're factually mistaken and I have hundreds of reasons why

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You have made no valid argument or provided any relevant information. That the government charged people does not prove they are right to charge people.

This is fucking retarded.

[–]dingoatemytaco 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

1) If that were true, he would not be the only one who knew it.

2) Testamony from others could include this claim, but does not.

3) EVERY TIME there are protest fuckups by the GOP, gravy seals, MAGAtards, Murican Taliban, NRA, KKK, or whatever right wing assholes, there is a massive effort to get shills on Twitter to say - WITH ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE - that there were paid agitators at the protest fuckup.

4) If you want to show agitators at protests, video them agitating, as many did at the BLM protests, showing white folks dressed in blackgravy seal gear and big masks, breaking windows and torching businesses. Those crackers were there to fuck up peaceful protests.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Whataboutism? Seriously?

[–]dingoatemytaco 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All good points, Chipit. Seems you're speechless.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So many shills in this thread, I think you hit a nerve.

I remember watching a video of Nancy Pelosi in a conference saying that they need to "make sure we call it an insurrection". This was months before Jan 6. She is deeply involved in this whole setup.

The fact that the FBI was there telling people to go in makes the whole thing, at best, entrapment. That is why they are violating the prisoner's rights and not allowing a trial where the evidence can come out. Instead they are holding a kangaroo court where the prisoner's aren't allowed a defense.

[–]agent_pecan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hilldogged

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Epsteined.

[–]TooMuchClay 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Reads like "Master Barista who closed shop suddenly was unable testify to customers admitted 'latte was done with low fat milk and was TOO HOT to drink'"

Hyperbolic inaccuracy serves no-one but the news outlet

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So we are just ignoring he died suddenly right before testifying? With his very inconvenient truths?