Monkeypox "not a gay disease" WHO says, while also noting that it's mainly being transmitted through gay sexual encounters

submitted by hfxB0oyA from newsweek.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

Who do you think you are kidding? 🤣

[–]spicebutton 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

You mean gay guys, interested in masculinity, find feminine features in youthful boys attractive? Every single culture displaying pedophilic practices in homosexuality have always been men such as yourself who are 90% straight. You're mostly straight men. You have no interest in masculine men and can only get hard for little boys. It's a dominance thing for you people.

Make your homophobia make sense. You dislike gays because theyre effeminate and "weak" in your eyes. And theyre attracted to masculinity. They cant have sex with feminine people (women and little boys).

Men such as yourself use boys as a substitute for women. Bacha Bazi in afghanistan, wasashi in japan...it exists everywhere for your type.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You mean gay guys, interested in masculinity,

I don't think that is a proper characterization of homosexuality. There are lots of gay men who are into effeminate men.

The issue is that within gay circles it is not a taboo for older men to sleep with teenage boys. "Hur der straight men do it to" is not a valid contradiction to that fact. Nor is "Hur der Afghanistan".

There is no subculture in Western society where straight men in relationships with underage children is accepted. It is accepted in the LGBT community.

[–]spicebutton 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

"HUR DER" You have a logistical network bigger and more impressive than Walmart's when it comes to child sex trafficking.

And where's the reasoning behind how it's acceptable for gay men to sleep with teenage boys and there's no stigma to it but in Alabama, the entire state elected a 50 year old man who proudly slept with multiple 15 year old girls? Yes, it's acceptable for you to sleep with teenagers and younger. Republicans are ok with it when they do it.

Just look at the pathetic levels of denialism people such as yourself and others perform on here: "africans arent heterosexuals! Theyre black! Teheheh" How fucking pathetic can you people get?

And the people into young little boys are the ones who use them as a substitute for women. You have thousands of years of history to back that up. That definition is the perfect characterization of homosexuality since it defines....homosexuals.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You have a logistical network bigger and more impressive than Walmart's when it comes to child sex trafficking.

Pedophiles are not straight. They are however the + in LGBTalphabet+. They are part of your sub culture.

And where's the reasoning behind how it's acceptable for gay men to sleep with teenage boys and there's no stigma to it but in Alabama, the entire state elected a 50 year old man who proudly slept with multiple 15 year old girls?

You start the sentence asking for the reasoning (already a dumb question) then just transition into another "her der they do it to" before the sentence even ends.

The reasoning is: the evidence supports this claim therfore it is true.

You're claim is essentially "it's not true because Republicans do it to."

It is just not logical.

Not being logical is clearly not a problem for you and the fact that you keep calling me straight then bi then straight as if that is a material fact in your arguments exposes why truth doesn't matter to you. You are clearly arguing not from facts but from a collectivist mentality. As a leftist you see the world as us vs them and everything is subjective. You are arguing for gays and think I am arguing against gays. In your mind this must mean that I am not gay and am an enemy of gays and my arguments are based on nothing more than a desire to attack gays.

This is a twisted view of the world. It is because you have such a corrupted take on the situation that we can never come to a resolution.

We would be able to agree on points that you perceive as anti straight but never on anything you perceive as anti gay. You are the definition of feelings matter more than facts.

[–]spicebutton 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

"Pedophiles are not straight....even though theyre straight and traffic little girls" "africans arent straight even though theyre swimming in AIDS and HIV....how can they be straight when they have AIDS" "Jeffrey Epstein isnt straight, he's jewish"

How do you not expect me to laugh at you when you speak like this? Am i supposed to make you feel better about yourself by nurturing your delusions? What in the fuck of christ kind of cognitive dissonance are you displaying here and why do you expect me to participate in it?

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

"Hur der I laugh at you" is not a valid argument. Stupid people laugh at the truth all the time.

It is so ironic that you keep bringing up epstien when that situation literally contradicts your point that "hur der straight people do it to". It is because that behavior is not accepted in society writ large that Mosad is able to blackmail politicians this way.

[–]spicebutton 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Pedophiles are not straight....even though theyre straight and traffic little girls" "africans arent straight even though theyre swimming in AIDS and HIV....how can they be straight when they have AIDS" "Jeffrey Epstein isnt straight, he's jewish"

How do you not expect me to laugh at you when you speak like this? Am i supposed to make you feel better about yourself by nurturing your delusions? What in the fuck of christ kind of cognitive dissonance are you displaying here and why do you expect me to participate in it?

Either respond to this or shut up. No one is going to indulge your straw man bullshit.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

You are not making an argument.

[–]spicebutton 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're not even engaging in one. Smearing your feces across the wall and then turning around to say "you're not making an argument" is not the "win" you think it is. No one is going to indulge your bad faith cockroachisms.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's interesting, gays don't show much talent for logic. So much so I kinda think Alan Turing must have been a fraud.

Did find this, but I didn't delve deeper, not sure it's true:

Some biographers have tried to tell us that Alan Turing was the only man on earth to crack the Enigma code machine of the Germans. However, the facts tell a different story. Truth is stranger than fiction. The Enigma machine and code book were captured and given to the British BEFORE World War Two. Research proves that Alan Turing was incapable of repairing his own bicycle and his only contribution to the war was to propose a ridiculous theory that failed to help anyone. Was Alan Turing nothing more than a fraud promoted by the British government to cover up the REAL story? This book reveals the truth behind the breaking of the Enigma cryptography machin and calls into question the life and claims of Alan Turing. These are the facts the movie failed to show the public.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/24117709-alan-turing-enigma-fraud