California Law Requiring Women On Corporate Boards Ruled Unconstitutional
submitted 1 year ago by [deleted] from (forbes.com)
[–]CreditKnifeMan 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
How did they..? Define..? A.. uh?
[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Logic melt down..
A law requiring a certain amount of people to "identify" a particular way may not actually be as obtusely Unconstitutionally discriminatory as it seems, since it doesn't discriminate based on an actual tangible thing, but instead a belief. Yet, it is Unconstitutional to discriminate based on religious beliefs.
...but yeah, any nutjob politician who voted for this obvious discrimination should be censure and voted off before their next expression of discriminatory hate gets more extreme.
[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
What about trans people? 😮 Equal Rights for eunuchs.
[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Then aren't all affirmative action laws unconstitutional?
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~4 users here now
[–]CreditKnifeMan 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun - (0 children)
[–]SoCo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)