you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I can't wait to track down your alt user account and whatever other subhuman sell-out miscreants that are sent to take your place.

you seem like you would be a great comrade under communism sir

[–]Zahn 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

It was an oversight for me to paint this with such a broad brush stroke. Yet, Socks was okay injecting defenseless children with an experimental "vaccine". Many shills of his caliber echo this sentiment often. It is un-ethical to use the vulnerable and children as guinea pigs for corporate profiteering. Therefore, people who advocate for this then fail to measure up to a basic modicum of accepted universal human behavior that would protect vulnerable members of society from potentially or provably dangerous things. Hence, the deserved subhuman label.

It's a boring but rewarding hobby for me to spot shills in the wild. Sort of like bird watching perhaps. There are so many different varieties, tactics and flavors of forum community disrupters. But no Comrade, I have no interest in hunting down people that simply disagree. There is a time and space for everyone to co-exist peacefully with meaningful discussion. It's just that the "shills" do not understand this premise and cannot help themselves from infiltrating spaces that differ in beliefs from them with the intention of ruining these spaces for everyone.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Yet, Socks was okay injecting defenseless children with an experimental "vaccine".

I see a lot of pro-Russian shills here and yet I don't stalk them like a lunatic, I just post what I have to say about it when I'm in the mood and then go outside.

It's a boring but rewarding hobby for me to spot shills in the wild.

Who do you think socks was hurting on this site that's full of anti-system people?

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Who do you think socks was hurting on this site that's full of anti-system people?

Everyone.

Regulars were fed up with his shit. New folks were turned off. Truth-seekers were confused by him. Lonely folks were finding solace in his sketchy conversations. And tyranny is seeking any reason to stomp us - including for advocating violence. And Quakers will be forever maligned via guilt by association.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

New folks were turned off.

How, if this is supposed to be a free speech site (or at least more free than Reddit)?

You either support free speech for everyone or you just want your own echo chamber.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

It's never been a free-speech site. It's always been for free-thinking and truth-seeking. The problem is not "fear of different ideas" or echo chambers, as has been said to death. Bad faith liars and advocates for violence are not welcome.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Bad faith liars

Isn't that just another label for "people I disagree with"? On Reddit they call them "racists", "homophobes" and such.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Bad faith liars

Isn't that just another label for "people I disagree with"?

No.

You should know there is a profound difference between someone who earnestly believes in a position with all its pros and cons and someone who deceives as a means to an end for whatever paycheck, zealot, or "justified" reasons they deem necessary.

On Reddit they call them "racists", "homophobes" and such.

I hope SaidIt is still better than Reddit where I refuse to spend time.