you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (18 children)

This site has rules. Socks broke them, repeatedly, was warned, then continued to break the rules.

[–]HibikiBlack 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. Saidit is already very liberal when it comes to free speech but it still has rules. Socks kept breaking them and paid the price.

[–][deleted]  (16 children)

[removed]

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

    Weekend saiditors, lol.

    Where's the commitment to arguing with strangers on the internet about things neither of you have any influence over?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Weekend saiditors my ass. There's hardly ever any activity on the weekends. People are only on here when they're supposed to be working.

    [–][deleted]  (10 children)

    [removed]

      [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

      I never asked the admins to permanently ban socks. I reported a rule violation. The ban was their call.

      [–]FediNetizen 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      I never asked the admins to permanently ban socks

      These right here are some weasel words. The most recent several dozen comments are you making a mountain out of a molehill. You technically didn't directly ask for the ban, but it was what you were hoping for.

      [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      I think socks should be allowed back on saidit. I think a temporary ban along with an agreement to follow the rules in the future would have been more appropriate, but I'm not an admin.

      [–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

      We've already done that with him, twice... he's been given so many chances and has chosen to continue to break the rules.

      [–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Just like AHS is just monitoring "hate subs".

      [–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      Not really. Socks hasn't been banned before, just told off, so that's what most people reporting him would have expected.

      [–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      socks was banned before, for a week (and ban evaded), then earned 3 strikes.

      [–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

      Talk to Chipit, he can give you retarded arguments.

      Many of us have different opinions if you'd bother to notice.

      [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

      You're right. A permanent ban was probably not warranted. I would be ok with socks coming back at some point, but not my call. I didn't ban her, the admins did.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [removed]

        [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        Advocating violence is not allowed on saidit, you've been banned. Alternate accounts for banned accounts are also not allowed.