SOCKS IS BANNED.

submitted by JasonCarswell from saidit.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]package 17 insightful - 10 fun17 insightful - 9 fun18 insightful - 10 fun -  (34 children)

What did he do to warrant a ban? He's an incomprehensibly retarded leftist normie but I've never seen him do anything even remotely rule breaking.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 15 insightful - 9 fun15 insightful - 8 fun16 insightful - 9 fun -  (33 children)

She advocated for the torture and murder of Tucker Carlson. This is just one example. https://ibb.co/1r2dy1R

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

If he was banned for this then that's some Reddit-like bullshit. Is this a free speech site or not?

u/magnora7 thoughts?

[–]magnora7 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (12 children)

Saidit doesn't allow advocating violence, and he was repeatedly advocating open and detailed violence against a specific person which is federally illegal.

[–]neomarxist_bullshit 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Can't say I know the context in this situation, but surely you can't take everything seriously? Is there no space for nuance? Stuff like that could be explained like a fantasy in one's head, something you don't seriously pay attention to.

If I say "someone should shoot Putin in the head", would I be breaking the rules too?

[–]socks-the-nigger 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😯

[–]Node 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Even if a joke or non-serious, you'll get threats of a ban by m7 and other admins. That's why I quit using this site.

[–][deleted]  (8 children)

[removed]

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

    Did you read her comments? She was sick in the head with deranged anger fantasies about some fox news journalist. This ban might encourage her to get some psychological help.

    [–][deleted]  (6 children)

    [removed]

      [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

      He didn't care about the rules in the first place, that's why he got banned...

      [–][deleted]  (2 children)

      [removed]

        [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

        Socks never told me her preferred pronouns. It would be sexist to default to "he". Can you provide a source for socks' preferred pronouns? If so, I would be glad to use them.

        [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 10 insightful - 6 fun10 insightful - 5 fun11 insightful - 6 fun -  (18 children)

        This site has rules. Socks broke them, repeatedly, was warned, then continued to break the rules.

        [–]HibikiBlack 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

        Exactly. Saidit is already very liberal when it comes to free speech but it still has rules. Socks kept breaking them and paid the price.

        [–][deleted]  (16 children)

        [removed]

          [–]jet199 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

          Weekend saiditors, lol.

          Where's the commitment to arguing with strangers on the internet about things neither of you have any influence over?

          [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

          Weekend saiditors my ass. There's hardly ever any activity on the weekends. People are only on here when they're supposed to be working.

          [–][deleted]  (10 children)

          [removed]

            [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

            I never asked the admins to permanently ban socks. I reported a rule violation. The ban was their call.

            [–]FediNetizen 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

            I never asked the admins to permanently ban socks

            These right here are some weasel words. The most recent several dozen comments are you making a mountain out of a molehill. You technically didn't directly ask for the ban, but it was what you were hoping for.

            [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

            I think socks should be allowed back on saidit. I think a temporary ban along with an agreement to follow the rules in the future would have been more appropriate, but I'm not an admin.

            [–]neomarxist_bullshit 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

            Just like AHS is just monitoring "hate subs".

            [–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

            Not really. Socks hasn't been banned before, just told off, so that's what most people reporting him would have expected.

            [–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            Talk to Chipit, he can give you retarded arguments.

            Many of us have different opinions if you'd bother to notice.

            [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

            You're right. A permanent ban was probably not warranted. I would be ok with socks coming back at some point, but not my call. I didn't ban her, the admins did.

            [–][deleted]  (1 child)

            [removed]

              [–]magnora7 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

              Advocating violence is not allowed on saidit, you've been banned. Alternate accounts for banned accounts are also not allowed.