you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

White people's population literally exploded threefold due to Imperialism and are only able to sustain it because Fritz Haber invented artificial fertilizer.

Is it one or the other? You are literally contradicting yourself. Industrialized farming sustains white people. The only need for fertilizer comes from the finite amount of arable land and the absurd WORLD population. You are confusing the claim that the WORLD can't sustain the WORLD population without fertilizer, with the claim that a small fraction of the world population can't.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Is it one or the other?

It's both. Imperialism increases the amount of arable land and artificial fertilizer is the only reason why they are able to maintain such population sizes. Usually, populations go up and down like a sine-wave due to availability of food and, due to the nature of Imperialism, whites are the least likely to have sustainable farming techniques and hence will deplete the soil fastest.

Hence the need for artificial fertilizer.

Industrialized farming sustains white people.

Haber Process

Also see above.

claim that the WORLD can't sustain the WORLD population without fertilizer

That claim is absurd because indigenous people have lived in those places for generations and would hence have learned to not deplete the soil like a dipshit Imperialist. This also applies to pre-Imperialism Europe, before kikes and Imperialists fucked everything with mass soil-depleting farming techniques like the aforementioned "industrialized farming"...which necessitates the Haber Process.

Do you remember the Bengal Famine? It was because the Imperialist British literally forced Bengal Indians to plant Opium. The world can sustain its own population - it just cannot do so under Imperialist rule.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The world can sustain its own population - it just cannot do so under Imperialist rule.

Wow. It's like you are so lost you don't even know why the topic is on farming.

There have been many artificial famines throughout history and they have absolutely nothing to do with a people's ability to feed themselves. If you want to talk about how forced starvation is oppressive then we can do that; but what we ARE talking about is your claim that white people would be unable to feed themselves if not for a jew. A claim I have thoroughly debunked. Apparently too thoroughly because you just got lost.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Wow. It's like you are so lost you don't even know why the topic is on farming.

White people post-Imperialism are unable to feed themselves if not for a Jew.

White people pre-Imperialism are a sparse population even within their own lands (i.e. Europe). The evolutionary strategy between pre-Imperialism Whites and post-Imperialism Whites are so staggeringly different that the modern White probably has virtually nothing to do with pre-Imperialism Whites.

For instance, if you take a 1500s white individual and you told him "throwing smoke in the air for the sake of industrialization is bad" he would agree. Even Tolkien agrees. In fact, Tolkien agrees so much that he outright wrote Industrialization itself as a villain. Now? It's just a bunch of Climate Change-denying faggots.

The white individual from the 1500s also does not divide based on skin color, but rather divides by nationality. The vast majority of them probably opposes Capitalism as the tool of the devil or something. Positions you will nearly never find in modern White.

The white man from the 1500s see the Orientals, both Ottoman and Chinese, as vastly superior civilizations where all the knowledge is kept. Kings outright looked to China's meritocracy for a way to get rid of the Priestly-class.

The current white population is Post-Imperialism and is hence unable to feed themselves if not for a Jew.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

White people post-Imperialism are unable to feed themselves if not for a Jew.

As I have explained, that is completely wrong. That is a baseless claim with zero supporting evidence.

Even Tolkien agrees.

The guy who wrote a childrens book is your idea of an authority figure?!

The vast majority of them probably opposes Capitalism as the tool of the devil or something.

Wow, one absurd claim after another. You just make up stories about what historical people think as if you have any idea. It's like you are just trying to take this as far off the rails as possible.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

As I have explained, that is completely wrong. That is a baseless claim with zero supporting evidence.

Ever heard of the Irish Potato Famine? Irish populations are artificially sustained by Imperialist superprofits then they starved to death like the subhumans they are.

The guy who wrote a childrens book is your idea of an authority figure?!

Who said about authority figure? He is merely an example, and his popularity reflects how many people holds his views. A data point, not authority figure.

Wow, one absurd claim after another. You just make up stories about what historical people think as if you have any idea. It's like you are just trying to take this as far off the rails as possible.

https://seantrainor.org/2015/09/25/a-short-history-of-catholic-anti-capitalism/

Nobody likes Capitalism except for kikes and their good goyim

https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/655/2/655.pdf

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Irish populations are artificially sustained by Imperialist superprofits

This is so absolutely ignorant of history it boggles the mind. The Irish potato famine was caused by a fungus that destroyed the crops. All the crops were grown by the people who ate them, and later starved when they lost them. Saying that this was somehow sustained by Imperialism is the stupidest thing you have said so far, and that is quite a feat.

It was also an intentional genocide as the British blockaded food aid from around the world to intentionally starve out the Irish.

Yet despite this oppression of the Irish they are doing better today than any 3rd world shit hole, precisely because they are not 3rd world people.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Do you think potatoes are indigenous to Ireland? The existence of potatoes on Ireland itself is an Imperialist superprofit.

The Irish potato famine was caused by a fungus that destroyed the crop

That's because Irish are subhuman and can't plant more than 1 variety of crop.

I'm guessing you are a subhuman low-IQ Irish dipshit which is why you are defending them, huh?

Yet despite this oppression of the Irish they are doing better today than any 3rd world shit hole

Yeah, the British "oppressed" the Irish like the Kikes "oppressed" the Whites or the Germans "oppressed" the Kikes. It's all fake. They do some theatrics then they give them gibsmedat. Just like how Whites are "oppressing" African-Americans. Their hatred is fake, they collude with each other.

They literally felt so bad for the idiot Irish subhumans that they gave them control of their banks. Very oppressed the Irish are! So oppressed that they are outright given control of the banks, media, government despite being low-IQ retards....the British must have felt sorry for them and their pathetic low-IQ brains.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The existence of potatoes on Ireland itself is an Imperialist superprofit.

By that logic literally everyone in the world is the beneficiary of imperialist superprofit because potatoes are available to everyone in the world thanks to imperialism. In fact 3rd world counties are far more the beneficiaries as they benefit from the far more valuable western technologies they inherited.

[–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

potatoes are available to everyone in the world thanks to imperialism

To a certain extent, it directly explains why most Anti-Imperialists only care for Imperialism within their own borders. If benefit > downside X will be favored. It is for the same reason as to why nobody cares about the US genocide of Native Americans (unless it is used to attack the US in retaliation for actual imperialism conducted in a nation's sphere of influence). It is for the same reason as to why it's so easy for kikes to create good goyim.

There's a reason why there used to be a sizable pro-US section of the CPC.

In fact 3rd world counties are far more the beneficiaries as they benefit from the far more valuable western technologies they inherited.

Excuse me? Most "western technologies" inherited by the Third-World was pretty much provided by the Soviet Union and their general Communist shenanigans. Unless you mean the shitty coal trains.

Communists are essentially Anti-Imperialists who reverse-engineer Imperialist technology, hence making everything they provide a benefit of Anti-Imperialism, not Imperialism.

Tanzania itself was built by China.