DC elementary school gave 4-year-olds ‘anti-racism’ ‘fistbook’ asking them to identify racist family members

submitted by [deleted] from foxnews.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (33 children)

[deleted]

    [–]AntiSemit 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (32 children)

    They are not brainwashed. They have to adopt shitty views in order to propagandize the Global South and hence continue Imperialist Superprofit extraction and hence increase the value of the US dollar and hence their ability to purchase cheap Starbucks coffee made with Guatemala child labor or something. These so-called "good goy boomers" are to the Global South what kikes pushing LGBTQ are to you.

    Read Settlers: The Mythology of the Good Goy by J. Sakai.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (31 children)

    They have to adopt shitty views in order to propagandize the Global South and hence continue Imperialist Superprofit extraction

    This is a 7 layer cake of propaganda and brainwashing at work. 3rd world countries are not poor because they get exploited. They are poor because the people who live there have a standard deviation lower average IQ.

    A low IQ worker that is "exploited" for labor would not otherwise be inventing penicillin if left to thier own devices. Without that job they would be starving to death. On welfare they would squander thier time watching TV and robbing thier neighbors for drug money.

    International corporations do not constitute western imperialism. The only way the word imperialism can be used logically is if you consider the international corporations thier own sovereign entity with power equal or greater than the host country. In which case there is nothing western about them, nor is thier exploitation of anyone a benefit to the west.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (30 children)

    They are poor because the people who live there have a standard deviation lower average IQ.

    How does "White people aren't living in shit conditions because they are subverted by kikes, White people are living in shit conditions because they are a standard deviation lower average IQ than kikes" sound?

    "A low-IQ goy that is "exploited" for shekels would not otherwise be inventing the Haber Process if left to their own devices. Without kikes they would be starving to death. On Imperialist Superprofits they would squander their time watching TV and being a wagie dronie cuckslave to the bourgeoisie"

    "The Jewish Over-Representation do not constitute the Shadow Cabal. The only way the word "Shadow Cabal" can be used logically is if you consider the Shadow Cabal their own sovereign entity with power equal or greater than the host country. In which case, nothing Jewish about them, nor is their exploitation of anyone a benefit to Israel"

    That's exactly how you sound like. By defending Imperialism you put forth the argument framework for which kikes can also be defended.

    It's also technically all true. Whites would literally starve to death if (((Fritz Haber))) did not exist.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (29 children)

    How does "White people yak yak yak" sound?

    It doesn't matter how it sounds what matters is if you can defend that claim. What matters is whether it is true.

    A low-IQ goy that is "exploited" for shekels would not otherwise be inventing

    This is true. If the "exploitation" is by way of voluntary employment.

    The only way the word "Shadow Cabal" can be used logically is if you consider the Shadow Cabal their own sovereign entity

    This is in fact not logical at all.

    By defending Imperialism you put forth the argument framework for which kikes can also be defended.

    "Hur der don't speak the truth if that truth can be used to defend jews hur der" That is what you sound like right now.

    I am not defending Imperialism, you are using that word wrong in what amounts to name calling.

    It's also technically all true. Whites would literally starve to death if (((Fritz Haber))) did not exist.

    Lol. People were quite alive before artificial fertilizer. White people are only 12% of the world population, less food would affect whites the least.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

    It doesn't matter how it sounds what matters is if you can defend that claim. What matters is whether it is true.

    I can. Your entire food supply relies on the invention of a certain kike haber. Go to any farm and see how much fertilizer they dumped into the soil. Every gram of fertilizer is literally only possible if the kike haber existed.

    If the "exploitation" is by way of voluntary employment.

    The "exploitation" in question is your tax dollars going to the Jew World Order

    This is in fact not logical at all.

    Yes it is.

    That is what you sound like right now.

    So you want me to actually address your points? Your points are nonsensical and ridiculous. You might as well say "White people would be nowhere without Indians inventing Calculus and the number 0" or something like that.

    It's stupid and absurd. Or should I attribute medical science to the kike Maimonides? Or perhaps attribute the entire concept of civilization to the the Sumerians or something?

    Hell, you probably will still be scribbling on expensive animal skins, shoot bows and arrows, and fight around with shitty swords if Genghis Khan didn't bring you Paper, Gunpowder, and Printing-Press technology.

    The COMPUTER is only possible with the aid of a faggot (((Turing)))

    White people are only 12% of the world population

    White people's population literally exploded threefold due to Imperialism and are only able to sustain it because Fritz Haber invented artificial fertilizer.

    Whites are about the most fertilizer-dependent race. Chinese people have already developed a method to synthesize glucose from CO2 artificially and hence have less need for the Haber process.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Your entire food supply relies on the invention of a certain kike haber.

    Incorrect. Your premis is flawed in several ways. As I have already pointed out Europe had no problem feeding itself before artificial fertilizers, and necessity is the mother of all inventions meaning the more scarce food became the more effort would be placed on crop research. Furthermore you are making the illogical assumption that white people could not have invented artificial fertilizers when there was never a shortage of great chemists in Europe. The biggest fear of scientists is getting scooped, meaning they rush to publish because other scientists will likely invent the same thing independently and only the first to publish gets credit.

    The history of European invention, in particular in chemistry, makes the invention of a nitrogen fixing chemical process all but certain. You are also making the claim that no other method of increasing crop yeilds is possible. It is in fact possible to selectively breed nitrogen fixing bacteria to be more efficient. To then utilize them on an industrial scale to create artificial fertilizers through a non chemical means.

    And again even without the haber process, or any artificial fertilizers, there is enough food to feed the entire white population. It is the billions of non whites who would need a serious population adjustment.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    necessity is the mother of all inventions meaning the more scarce food became the more effort would be placed on crop research.

    Now you are making "necessity is the mother of all inventions" claims

    How hypocritical

    When it's other races you would claim "Whites are required to make everything!"

    Yet when it's yours you claim "Necessity is the mother of invention"

    It's obvious that you are nothing more than a salty kike puppet. By the way, your entire CIA propaganda apparatus which allows you to buy Global South goods for cheap and have decently-priced gasoline is ALSO a kike invention. Kneel before your masters more, kike puppet. They are the only ones who feed you with not just Haber Process Fertilizer-grown food, but also Imperialist Superprofits.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    The "exploitation" in question is your tax dollars going to the Jew World Order

    Oh, ok. So you are just making a false equivalency. Just because one claim of oppression is absurd -that employing someone is oppression- does not mean that all claims of oppression are absurd.

    I would agree that the central banking system is oppressive. It creates a financial burden on the host country, and like any such burden it will slow down progress.

    But your claim is that the "global south" is somehow uniquely burdened yet all countries have this same problem. How do you explain that? Why are white counties not in the same poverty despite paying even more to the "jew world order"?

    And if this is the "oppression" in question then it is not western or white. This is globalist jew oppression. Neither western countries or white people see any benefit from jews oppressing 3rd world countries. They are in fact themselves burdened by the same.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    But your claim is that the "global south" is somehow uniquely burdened yet all countries have this same problem. How do you explain that? Why are white counties not in the same poverty despite paying even more to the "jew world order"?

    White countries pay the LEAST to the Jew World Order. It's the Global South children enslaved to Capitalist plantations who pay the most to the Jew World Order. You never had to slave away in some coffee plantation or emerald mine as a kid or for your whole life.

    And if this is the "oppression" in question then it is not western or white.

    If whites are defending the oppression (which they are) it is, in part, White-oppression.

    Neither western countries or white people see any benefit from jews oppressing 3rd world countries.

    Jews oppressing 3rd-world countries literally lower the prices of goods for you. That's why you can have decently-priced gasoline, and hence food and other gasoline-reliant commodities, back before the Putin affair. Kikes were pressing down the gasoline prices for their good goyim.

    If you go to a supermarket, I reckon it's basically impossible to find a commodity not subsidized by Jewish bullshit in the Global South.

    They are in fact themselves burdened by the same.

    The "burden" the kikes place on the whites amounts to mere kvetching about culture wars. The burden placed on the Global South literally extracts their purchasing power and gives it to you.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    White countries pay the LEAST to the Jew World Order.

    Factually incorrect. Those countries can't possibly pay more when their entire GDP is less than the direct payment the US makes to Isreal every year.

    You never had to slave away in some coffee plantation

    The fate of a country is not dependent on my personal struggles or the struggles of the most unfortunate kid in a shit hole country. There are kids in even the wealthiest countries who lead lives with no hope. Yet those countries are not plunged into poverty.

    Child labor laws in those countries are so bad because those counties are full of adults who can't produce enough to support their own kids. And, no, it is not because they don't get paid enough. It is because they lack the intelligence to make thier own way in life and therfore are stuck having to work for someone else.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Factually incorrect. Those countries can't possibly pay more when their entire GDP is less than the direct payment the US makes to Isreal every year.

    It's bigger on paper because kikes are inflating purchasing power via. the Petrodollar. All advantages gained from Petrodollar is directly subsidized by the Global South.

    Child labor laws in those countries are so bad because those counties are full of adults who can't produce enough to support their own kids. And, no, it is not because they don't get paid enough. It is because they lack the intelligence to make thier own way in life and therfore are stuck having to work for someone else.

    Go back to economics school. It's basic supply and demand. You do a little regime change to introduce Child Labor, supply goes up, wages go down, profit goes up. Child labor only benefits the kikes.

    It's the same reason why the US have the Feminist movement: so the kikes can milk extra labor from you. Feminism in the US serves the same purpose as Child Labor in the Global South: to increase production while reducing wages.

    Child Labor literally has the same impact as Feminism to the economics of a country but worse: you triple the number of wagies and you lower their wages 3x. It's classic kike exploitation. They do it to you too - it's one of the reasons why your job pays half of what it should.

    These are also Nestle jobs btw. Nestle Child Labor jobs can only exist when Imperialism exists. That's why it's in Guatemala. The proportion of child laborers is directly proportional to the amount of Imperialist fuckery. That's why it's concentrated in South America and Africa, with far less in Malaysia.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Jews oppressing 3rd-world countries literally lower the prices of goods for you.

    Jews oppressing white countries literally raises that price even higher. Before the US went off the gold standard allowing Jewish banks to print money for themselves and debasing the purchasing power of the currency a man with a high school diploma was able to support a family on one salary.

    Jewish oppression does not make western lifestyles possible, it makes them harder.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    a man with a high school diploma was able to support a family on one salary.

    Which is only possible with Jewish Imperialism. Who runs the CIA? Kikes.

    Before the US went off the gold standard allowing Jewish banks to print money for themselves

    Cause they realized that you are a bunch of antisemitic parasites on their Imperialism. You are useless to them, but you need them to survive. Hence, they are cutting you out of the equation.

    The only thing the White Goy provides to the Kike are retarded bodies to die in wars for Pissrael, and what does the white goy get in return? Imperialist Petrodollar Superprofits, Imperialistic subversion of Native lands, BLACK COTTON SLAVES, all the Jewish tricks played on Native peoples, etc. Imperialism is carried by kikes and disproportionately benefits the White Goy.

    The Jew has only recently learned to cut you out of the Imperialist Gibsmedat. They don't need whites, whites are a liability.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    The "burden" the kikes place on the whites amounts to mere kvetching about culture wars. The burden placed on the Global South literally extracts their purchasing power and gives it to you.

    Absolute nonsense. Jews used central banking to forge untold trillions of dollars, systematically buying up all the businesses. They give nothing and take everything. They are a cancer like no other.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Your IQ is simply too low to make new businesses free of kikes

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

    White people's population literally exploded threefold due to Imperialism and are only able to sustain it because Fritz Haber invented artificial fertilizer.

    Is it one or the other? You are literally contradicting yourself. Industrialized farming sustains white people. The only need for fertilizer comes from the finite amount of arable land and the absurd WORLD population. You are confusing the claim that the WORLD can't sustain the WORLD population without fertilizer, with the claim that a small fraction of the world population can't.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

    Is it one or the other?

    It's both. Imperialism increases the amount of arable land and artificial fertilizer is the only reason why they are able to maintain such population sizes. Usually, populations go up and down like a sine-wave due to availability of food and, due to the nature of Imperialism, whites are the least likely to have sustainable farming techniques and hence will deplete the soil fastest.

    Hence the need for artificial fertilizer.

    Industrialized farming sustains white people.

    Haber Process

    Also see above.

    claim that the WORLD can't sustain the WORLD population without fertilizer

    That claim is absurd because indigenous people have lived in those places for generations and would hence have learned to not deplete the soil like a dipshit Imperialist. This also applies to pre-Imperialism Europe, before kikes and Imperialists fucked everything with mass soil-depleting farming techniques like the aforementioned "industrialized farming"...which necessitates the Haber Process.

    Do you remember the Bengal Famine? It was because the Imperialist British literally forced Bengal Indians to plant Opium. The world can sustain its own population - it just cannot do so under Imperialist rule.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

    It's both.

    Illogical. If imperialism allowed for a trippling of the population then artificial fertilizers are obviously not necessary.

    whites are the least likely to have sustainable farming techniques and hence will deplete the soil fastest.

    Literally disprove by history. White people had the best farming techniques, and invented crop rotation and selective breeding.

    That claim is absurd because indigenous people have lived in those places for generations and would hence have learned to not deplete the soil like a dipshit Imperialist.

    Yeah, they starve every year and it keeps thier population low. It has nothing to do with knowledge as they never even figured out crop rotation.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    If imperialism allowed for a trippling of the population then artificial fertilizers are obviously not necessary.

    It's about sustainability of population increase. Imperialism triples your population but does not do it in a sustainable way. The fact that you are making this argument in the first place shows that your IQ is truly one standard deviation below mine.

    Literally disprove by history. White people had the best farming techniques, and invented crop rotation and selective breeding.

    Even Native Americans rotated crops you dipshit, crop rotation is literally baby shit. If you are proud of "crop rotation" one might wonder how "advanced" you really are.

    Selective breeding also existed long before Darwin. In fact, wild horses don't even exist today - it's just all feral horses.

    Yeah, they starve every year and it keeps thier population low. It has nothing to do with knowledge as they never even figured out crop rotation.

    Yet you can't back that up. I'm pretty sure you Irish trash starve every year, though.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

    The world can sustain its own population - it just cannot do so under Imperialist rule.

    Wow. It's like you are so lost you don't even know why the topic is on farming.

    There have been many artificial famines throughout history and they have absolutely nothing to do with a people's ability to feed themselves. If you want to talk about how forced starvation is oppressive then we can do that; but what we ARE talking about is your claim that white people would be unable to feed themselves if not for a jew. A claim I have thoroughly debunked. Apparently too thoroughly because you just got lost.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Wow. It's like you are so lost you don't even know why the topic is on farming.

    White people post-Imperialism are unable to feed themselves if not for a Jew.

    White people pre-Imperialism are a sparse population even within their own lands (i.e. Europe). The evolutionary strategy between pre-Imperialism Whites and post-Imperialism Whites are so staggeringly different that the modern White probably has virtually nothing to do with pre-Imperialism Whites.

    For instance, if you take a 1500s white individual and you told him "throwing smoke in the air for the sake of industrialization is bad" he would agree. Even Tolkien agrees. In fact, Tolkien agrees so much that he outright wrote Industrialization itself as a villain. Now? It's just a bunch of Climate Change-denying faggots.

    The white individual from the 1500s also does not divide based on skin color, but rather divides by nationality. The vast majority of them probably opposes Capitalism as the tool of the devil or something. Positions you will nearly never find in modern White.

    The white man from the 1500s see the Orientals, both Ottoman and Chinese, as vastly superior civilizations where all the knowledge is kept. Kings outright looked to China's meritocracy for a way to get rid of the Priestly-class.

    The current white population is Post-Imperialism and is hence unable to feed themselves if not for a Jew.

    [–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Your points are nonsensical and ridiculous.

    Yet you can't seem to support that claim.

    You might as well say "White people would be nowhere without Indians inventing Calculus and the number 0" or something like that.

    That is a straw man argument. What I said is not based on the premise that "white people invented something in the past therfore anyone who utilizes that technology would be nowhere without white people". That is an argument you invented.

    What I said was simply that the reason 3rd world countries ARE nowhere (compared to the west) is NOT because of the invisible (and imaginary) hand of white oppression but because of the measurable discrepancy in IQ.

    [–]AntiSemit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I literally supported all my claims.

    What I said is not based on the premise that "white people invented something in the past therfore anyone who utilizes that technology would be nowhere without white people".

    It's literally based on this premise.

    What I said was simply that the reason 3rd world countries ARE nowhere (compared to the west) is NOT because of the invisible (and imaginary) hand of white oppression but because of the measurable discrepancy in IQ.

    #1 - The Ottomans, Ethiopia, Vietnam, and India were decently-advanced civilizations back before Imperialism. They fell because they were experiencing decline.

    #2 - Tanzania is doing fine, thank you very much.

    #3 - At this point, Pakistan and Vietnam are honestly better places to live than Democrat-run places. Less kikes. China's T1 cities outright surpasses all of the US's. The Imperialist-Free Third World is literally more well-maintained than kiked shitholes.

    So your claim that "Third-World Countries are nowhere" is also only true in places where Imperialism is not destroyed. Also, those countries are going to be even better once OBOR is complete.