you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The question is how long before the world starts to notice the immunodeficiency.

If any significant number of people were already immunodeficient from the vaccine, why haven't we seen it already?

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There is a thousand fold increase in childhood heart attacks and everyone is still denying that the jab is causing it. If you trust that you would be informed of it causing AIDS there is something wrong with your ability to reason.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

there is something wrong with your ability to reason.

You say that about me? Come on dude, really simple, if people were immunocompromised now they'd be dropping like flies.

Sure there's increased heart attacks, but we're talking about a relatively small subset of people. I'm not defending it, that's fucked up, but the immunocompromised thing is Q levels of illogical since we'd already be seeing that.

[–]raven9 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

if people were immunocompromised now they'd be dropping like flies.

Why would they? If you caught HIV in 2020 it would be 5 to 10 years before you started to notice symptoms associated with full blown aids. I expect we will start to see this beginning in 2025.

Also watch them try to blame all of that on the vaccines. This is because the NIH funded the research the created this bioweapon so they want to shift the blame onto the vaccines. Of course that is why they classified the vaccines 'liability exempt'.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Huh, that is a good point. I still think with so many people vaccinated we would have seen signs like an uptick in opportunistic infections fairly soon.